Will Germany's New Social Media Law Kill Free Speech?

In October a new law comes into force in Germany that will impose huge fines on social networks if they don't delete illegal content including hate speech. It's touched off a huge debate over freedom of expression and has attracted an unusual collection of opponents.

The law, called Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz, or  NetzDG for short obliges the biggest social networks, those with more than two million German users, to take down "blatantly illegal" hate speech within 24 hours of it being reported.

For material that's less obviously violating the law, networks such as Facebook and Instagram will have seven days to consider and, if appropriate, delete posts. Failure to meet these deadlines could lead to fines of up to €50m.

Critics argue the short timeframes coupled with the potentially large fines will lead social networks to be overly cautious and delete huge amounts of content - even things that are perfectly legal. But the law's supporters, and the German government, argue that it will force social media companies to proactively deal with online incitement and hate speech.

What counts as 'illegal hate speech' in Germany?

The law doesn't actually change what's considered hate speech in Germany. No new offences are created. The law simply cites sections of the German Criminal Code which details illegal speech online. The categories range from "forming terrorist organisations", to the much vaguer "defamation of religions, religious and ideological associations."

In addition, German law restricts some types of speech that are allowed in many other countries. For instance, the use of Nazi symbols is banned, as are the symbols and flags of some extremist groups.

An earlier draft of the NetzDG bill barred "defamation of the President of the Federation", but the clause was removed after criticism. The law has also been criticised for containing no legal mechanism for people whose posts are wrongly deleted to appeal to get them reinstated.

So who is worried?

Opposition has come from a wide range of groups and politicians on both the left and right, and Facebook has also made its disagreement with the law clear.

The United Nations has also weighed in. David Kaye, the UN's Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression, has written to the German government to warn about the potential consequences of the law.

"With these 24 hour and seven day deadlines - if you are a company you are going to want avoid fines and bad public branding of your platform," he says. "If there is a complaint about a post you are just going to take it down. What is in it for you to leave it up? I think the result is likely to be greater censorship."

The group Reporters without Borders says the German law has already inspired a "draconian" new online media law in Russia.

But there are voices in Germany who are in favour of the law and who argue that making social networks more responsible for hate speech and illegal content on their platforms is a good thing.
 
Anas Modamani is a refugee from Syria who now lives in Berlin. In August 2015 he was catapulted to notoriety for taking a selfie with Angela Merkel while she was visiting a migrant shelter.

But the picture would come back to haunt him, as it was used to accuse him of attacks in Brussels and Berlin. His famous photograph was cropped and pasted into wanted posters and false news reports.

"When I read the fake news on the internet, I really cried, it was really bad in my life, it was all untrue," Modamani says.

He decided to take Facebook to court for not doing enough to stop the lies being shared about him, but in March 2017 he lost the case. The court ruled Facebook had taken enough measures to attempt to block defamatory images of him for users in Germany.

Because of his experiences, Modamani is a supporter of NetzDG.

"I think the law is a good idea because people will be a little bit afraid, they can't just write what they want," he says. "I don't mind if other comments get deleted along with the bad ones."

Modamani's lawyer, Chan-Jo Jun, is also optimistic about the new law, and plans to use it immediately after it comes into effect.

On the other side of the legal debate is attorney Joachim Steinhoefel. While Chan-Jo Jun has taken Facebook to court to get them to remove posts, Steinhoefel has threatened the company with legal action to get a post reinstated.

In May, photojournalist Markus Hibbeler wrote a Facebook post about Islam and freedom of expression. Translated from German, the post read in part: "We shouldn't shield Muslims, and certainly not Islam, which has never been through an enlightenment or reformation, from criticism and constantly protect them."

His post was deleted by Facebook and his account was suspended for seven days. Hibbeler, with Steinhoefel's help, threatened to sue Facebook if the post wasn't put back up within a week and his account reinstated. They succeeded, and Facebook reinstated the post and apologised.

It's cases like Hibbeler's, Steinhoefel says, that show how NetzDG threatens freedom of expression. He says he doesn't trust Facebook to decide what posts are legal and illegal and thinks the most likely outcome will be a mass deletion of legal posts that Facebook doesn't want to take any risks with, out of an abundance of caution.

Opposition from social media companies

A Facebook spokesperson admitted to the BBC that they can't rule out the possibility of legal content being deleted.

"The law is not the right way to fight hate speech online," the spokesperson says. "It provides an incentive to delete content that is not clearly illegal and would have the effect of transferring responsibility for complex legal decisions from public authorities to private companies.

"Several legal experts have assessed the draft law as being against the German constitution and non-compliant with EU law. Facebook is committed to working in partnership with governments and civil society on solutions that would have made this law unnecessary."

The BBC also learnt that although the company will soon have another 500 content moderators based in Essen, in western Germany, Facebook has not hired any new staff in response to the law.

"We are still evaluating what the law really means for us," the spokesperson says.

Ein News

You Might Also Read: 

UK 'biggest audience' In EU For Jihadist Web Content:

Bashing Facebook Is Not The Answer To Curbing Russian Influence Operations:

 

« Wanted: A New Microchip For The AI Era
Using Big Data To Improve Customer Experience & Results »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

CYRIN

CYRIN

CYRIN® Cyber Range. Real Tools, Real Attacks, Real Scenarios. See why leading educational institutions and companies in the U.S. have begun to adopt the CYRIN® system.

The PC Support Group

The PC Support Group

A partnership with The PC Support Group delivers improved productivity, reduced costs and protects your business through exceptional IT, telecoms and cybersecurity services.

MIRACL

MIRACL

MIRACL provides the world’s only single step Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) which can replace passwords on 100% of mobiles, desktops or even Smart TVs.

IT Governance

IT Governance

IT Governance is a leading global provider of information security solutions. Download our free guide and find out how ISO 27001 can help protect your organisation's information.

TÜV SÜD Academy UK

TÜV SÜD Academy UK

TÜV SÜD offers expert-led cybersecurity training to help organisations safeguard their operations and data.

FlashRouters

FlashRouters

FlashRouters offers DD-WRT compatible router models with improved performance, privacy/security options, and advanced functionality.

Mimecast

Mimecast

Mimecast delivers cloud-based email management for Microsoft Exchange and Microsoft Office 365 including archiving, continuity and security.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub enables developers to build secure realtime Mobile, Web, and IoT Apps.

I-Tracing

I-Tracing

I-TRACING are experts in IT security, specialized in legal compliance of information systems, security of information systems, and the collection of digital evidence and traces.

Cybersecurity Philippines CERT (CSP-CERT)

Cybersecurity Philippines CERT (CSP-CERT)

Cybersecurity Philippines CERT is the national Computer Emergency Response Team for the Philippines.

Kroll

Kroll

Kroll provides clients a way to build, protect and maximize value through our differentiated financial and risk advisory and intelligence.

ODSC

ODSC

ODSC is a security systems integrator that provides services and expertise in identity management and access.

Langner

Langner

Langner is a software and consulting firm specialized in cyber security for critical infrastructure and large-scale manufacturing.

DestructData

DestructData

DestructData is a leading independent provider of End of Life data destruction/security solutions.

Vaadata

Vaadata

Vaadata are experts in ethical hacking. We secure your web, mobile and IoT platforms.

Ensighten

Ensighten

Ensighten is a leader in Website Security & Privacy Compliance. Protect your website from malicious attacks, monitor & detect vulnerabilities, protect consumer data.

Netizen

Netizen

Netizen is an award-winning company that develops and leverages innovative solutions to enable a more secure cyberspace for clients in government and commercial markets.

Have I Been Pwned (HIBP)

Have I Been Pwned (HIBP)

Have I Been Pwned is a free resource for anyone to quickly assess if they may have been put at risk due to an online account of theirs having been compromised or "pwned" in a data breach.

UncommonX

UncommonX

UncommonX offers enterprise-class cybersecurity protection for mid-size organizations by combining adaptive threat and intelligence software with 24/7 industry experts.

Lancera

Lancera

Lancera provides growth accelerating Software Development, Web Presence and Cybersecurity Solutions with a focus on customer happiness.

InQuest

InQuest

InQuest specialize in providing comprehensive network-based security solutions that empower organizations to protect their most critical assets: their people.