US Has A Secret Cyberwar Going Against North Korea

Three years ago, President Barack Obama ordered Pentagon officials to step up their cyber and electronic strikes against North Korea’s missile program in hopes of sabotaging test launches in their opening seconds.

Soon a large number of the North’s military rockets began to explode, veer off course, disintegrate in midair and plunge into the sea.

Advocates of such efforts say they believe that targeted attacks have given American antimissile defenses a new edge and delayed by several years the day when North Korea will be able to threaten American cities with nuclear weapons launched atop intercontinental ballistic missiles.

But other experts have grown increasingly skeptical of the new approach, arguing that manufacturing errors, disgruntled insiders and sheer incompetence can also send missiles awry.

Over the past eight months, they note, the North has managed to successfully launch three medium-range rockets. And Kim Jong-un, the North Korean leader, now claims his country is in “the final stage in preparations” for the inaugural test of his intercontinental missiles, perhaps a bluff, perhaps not.

An examination of the Pentagon’s disruption effort, based on interviews with officials of the Obama and Trump administrations as well as a review of extensive but obscure public records, found that the United States still does not have the ability to effectively counter the North Korean nuclear and missile programs.

Those threats are far more resilient than many experts thought and pose such a danger that Mr. Obama, as he left office, warned President Trump they were likely to be the most urgent problem he would confront.

Mr. Trump has signaled his preference to respond aggressively against the North Korean threat. In a Twitter post after Mr. Kim first issued his warning on New Year’s Day, the president wrote, “It won’t happen!” Yet like Mr. Obama before him, Mr. Trump is quickly discovering that he must choose from highly imperfect options.

He could order the escalation of the Pentagon’s cyber and electronic warfare effort, but that carries no guarantees. He could open negotiations with the North to freeze its nuclear and missile programs, but that would leave a looming threat in place.

He could prepare for direct missile strikes on the launch sites, which Mr. Obama also considered, but there is little chance of hitting every target. He could press the Chinese to cut off trade and support, but Beijing has always stopped short of steps that could lead to the regime’s collapse.

In two meetings of Mr. Trump’s national security deputies in the Situation Room, all those options were discussed, along with the possibility of reintroducing nuclear weapons to South Korea as a dramatic warning. Administration officials say those issues will soon go to Mr. Trump and his top national security aides.

The decision to intensify the cyber and electronic strikes, in early 2014, came after Mr. Obama concluded that the $300 billion spent since the Eisenhower era on traditional antimissile systems, often compared to hitting “a bullet with a bullet,” had failed the core purpose of protecting the continental United States.

Flight tests of interceptors based in Alaska and California had an overall failure rate of 56 percent, under near-perfect conditions. Privately, many experts warned the system would fare worse in real combat.

So the Obama administration searched for a better way to destroy missiles. It reached for techniques the Pentagon had long been experimenting with under the rubric of “left of launch,” because the attacks begin before the missiles ever reach the launch-pad, or just as they lift off.

For years, the Pentagon’s most senior officers and officials have publicly advocated these kinds of sophisticated attacks in little-noticed testimony to Congress and at defense conferences.

The approach taken in targeting the North Korean missiles has distinct echoes of the American, and Israeli-led sabotage of Iran’s nuclear program, the most sophisticated known use of a cyber-weapon meant to cripple a nuclear threat.

But even that use of the “Stuxnet” worm in Iran quickly ran into limits. It was effective for several years, until the Iranians figured it out and recovered. And Iran posed a relatively easy target: an underground nuclear enrichment plant that could be attacked repeatedly.

In North Korea, the target is much more challenging. Missiles are fired from multiple launch sites around the country and moved about on mobile launchers in an elaborate shell game meant to deceive adversaries. To strike them, timing is critical.

Advocates of the sophisticated effort to remotely manipulate data inside North Korea’s missile systems argue the United States has no real alternative because the effort to stop the North from learning the secrets of making nuclear weapons has already failed.

The only hope now is stopping the country from developing an intercontinental missile, and demonstrating that destructive threat to the world.

The White House is also looking at pre-emptive military strike options, a senior Trump administration official said, though the challenge is huge given the country’s mountainous terrain and deep tunnels and bunkers.

Putting American tactical nuclear weapons back in South Korea, they were withdrawn a quarter-century ago, is also under consideration, even if that step could accelerate an arms race with the North.

NYTimes

Cyberwarfare: Borders Offer No Defense:

Surprise: N Korea Hacked S Korea Cyber Command:

Was North Korea Behind The IoT DDoS Attack?:

 

 

« Newspaper Subscriptions are on the Rise
Increasing Healthcare Cybersecurity Risks »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

ManageEngine

ManageEngine

As the IT management division of Zoho Corporation, ManageEngine prioritizes flexible solutions that work for all businesses, regardless of size or budget.

DigitalStakeout

DigitalStakeout

DigitalStakeout enables cyber security professionals to reduce cyber risk to their organization with proactive security solutions, providing immediate improvement in security posture and ROI.

The PC Support Group

The PC Support Group

A partnership with The PC Support Group delivers improved productivity, reduced costs and protects your business through exceptional IT, telecoms and cybersecurity services.

Clayden Law

Clayden Law

Clayden Law advise global businesses that buy and sell technology products and services. We are experts in information technology, data privacy and cybersecurity law.

BackupVault

BackupVault

BackupVault is a leading provider of automatic cloud backup and critical data protection against ransomware, insider attacks and hackers for businesses and organisations worldwide.

SABSACourses

SABSACourses

SABSA is a development process used for solving complex problems such as IT Operations, Risk Management, Compliance & Audit functions.

ProfitBricks

ProfitBricks

ProfitBricks is a secure cloud computing infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) solution.

K&D Insurance Brokers

K&D Insurance Brokers

K&D provide insurance for all sectors of industry and commerce including cyber risk cover.

Privacy Analytics

Privacy Analytics

Privacy Analytics enables healthcare organizations to unleash the value of sensitive data for secondary purposes without compromising personal health information.

cleverDome

cleverDome

cleverDome has created the first community built and proven model that redefines the standards for protecting the most confidential data and information of consumers in the cloud.

VikingCloud

VikingCloud

VikingCloud (formerly Sysnet Global Solutions) offers organizations an integrated cybersecurity and compliance solution to make informed, predictive, and cost-effective risk mitigation and prevention

Foundries.io

Foundries.io

Foundries.io have built a secure, open source platform for the world's connected devices, and a cloud service to configure this to any hardware and any cloud.

Noetic Cyber

Noetic Cyber

Noetic provides a proactive approach to cyber asset and controls management, empowering security teams to see, understand, and optimize their cybersecurity posture.

Moro Hub

Moro Hub

Moro Hub, a subsidiary of Digital DEWA, is a UAE-based digital data hub focused on digital transformation and operational services.

ClearShark

ClearShark

Since 2001, ClearShark has been a go-to adviser in the U.S. Public Sector for creating customized and integrated solutions for the most secure of networks.

Crayon

Crayon

Crayon is a customer-centric innovation and IT services company. We provide guidance on the best solutions for our clients’ business needs and budget with software, cloud, AI and big data.

Oxeye

Oxeye

Oxeye fills the gap between cloud and code to show exploitable vulnerabilities, and their path from API to code. More visibility. Less noise. More time to build.

Quarkslab

Quarkslab

Quarkslab is a dedicated team of cyber-security engineers and developers. We aim at forcing the attackers, not the defender, to adapt constantly.

NexGen Cyber

NexGen Cyber

NexGen Cyber helps customers in commercial SMB markets with IT security, security integration, service management, outsourced service transition, and transformative security solutions.

SecureClaw

SecureClaw

SecureClaw offers specialized cybersecurity consultation, various products, and a range of services to meet your company's business domain needs.

Piiano

Piiano

Piiano offers developer-friendly privacy and security products. Reduce risk and protect your data by using our specialized security and privacy SaaS tools.