The High Cost Of Politicising Intelligence

Intelligence analysis is more an imperfect art than  a science: Gaps in reporting, bad sources and increasing politicisation all complicate the analyst’s task.

The White House recently sought to enlist the Departments of Homeland Security and Justice to build a case for its controversial and unpopular immigration ban. Among intelligence professionals, the request to produce analysis that supports a favored policy, vice producing analysis, and allowing it to inform policy, is called politicisation, which intends to use all the different media and Internet connections to get the bias messages out there. 

It is anathema to the training most analysts receive and the values that lie at the heart of the vocation. There is a high cost to putting ideology over informed assessments of political, economic, and military realities.

At the Central Intelligence Agency, where Dennis Gleeson served as director of strategy in the Directorate of Analysis, the subject of politicisation is introduced to analysts almost as soon as they enter into service. 

There is good reason for this: Politicisation is not an academic issue.

During the Cold War, the Ford administration convened a Team B comprised of conservative foreign-policy thinkers to challenge the intelligence community’s estimates of Soviet nuclear capabilities. 

Then-CIA director and future President George H.W. Bush later concluded the group’s work lent “itself to manipulation for purposes other than estimative accuracy.”

In the early 1990s, after a rocky confirmation process during which he was accused of politicizing intelligence analysis, Director of the CIA Robert Gates implemented a series of reforms aimed at guarding against political or ideological thinking coloring intelligence analysis. Gates described politicisation as “deliberately distorting analysis or judgments to favor a preferred line of thinking irrespective of evidence.”

Recently, President George W. Bush’s administration exerted unusual pressure to have the CIA support its plans to invade Iraq because of that country’s alleged ties to al-Qaeda and its weapons of mass destruction program. 

Both assumptions proved flawed. Nada Bakos wrote about the problems with efforts to tie Iraq to al-Qaeda for Wired. An internal CIA post-mortem concluded that the CIA’s assessments of the Iraqi WMD program were a case of an effective denial-and-deception program that fed prevailing assumptions.

Intelligence analysis is more an imperfect art than it is a science: Gaps in reporting, bad sources, and circular reporting all complicate the analyst’s quest for knowledge and understanding. As a result, we have seen the rise of ideas like “words of estimative probability,” which, like any language, assume a degree of fluency that rarely exists.

Compelling the government’s cadre of professional analysts to partake in ideological fantasy will undermine America’s national security, not enhance it.

Politicisation, however, sits on top of all of these complicating factors because it is an act of willful commission: At its most overt, it amounts to using a political position to get people to say that a clear, bright blue sky is cloudy.

While the CIA prides itself on a tradition of “truth to power,” the reality of telling high-ranking officials that their beliefs are not supported by either the available reporting or the informed opinions of a cross-section of the analytic cadre is far more-weighty than those three words convey. Speaking “truth to power” requires courage, because political partisans are all too happy to causally decry dissent as disloyalty.

What is the cost of politicisation? As of 2013, it was estimated that the American invasion of Iraq in 2003 cost an estimated $1.7 trillion, and saw over 4,000 Americans killed in action and over 30,000 wounded in action. Those numbers don’t include the families of the fallen; the innocent Iraqis killed or wounded during the conflict; or the insurgency that evolved into the extremist threat that we now know as ISIS.

The irony is that President Trump is a vocal critic of his predecessors’ decisions to invade, occupy, and ultimately withdraw from Iraq. In the run-up to that war, the Department of Defense formed an Office of Special Plans, conceived by Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, which as Seymour Hersh argued in The New Yorker, “was created in order to find evidence of what Wolfowitz and his boss, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, believed to be true” about Iraq the threat it posed to the world. 

By trying to shape analysis to support his administration’s world view, Trump is creating the conditions for committing our country to courses of action that have the potential to be as costly or disastrous.

This administration may seek solace in reality-distorting “alternative facts,” but politicizing intelligence is a massive disservice to the American taxpayer. 

There are plenty of media outlets, web sites, and pundits that cater to the full spectrum of American political thought, to include those strains of belief that are more about subjective feelings than informed realities. 

image by Nick Youngson: http://nyphotographic.com

DefenseOne

Data Fusion For Military Intelligence & Business:       Is It Possible To Neutralise Fake News?:

 

« Keeping The Cloud Safe: Exclusive Report
A Common Language For Sharing Intelligence On Cybersecurity Threats »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO is the market leader in HPE Non-Stop Security, Risk Management and Compliance.

Perimeter 81 / How to Select the Right ZTNA Solution

Perimeter 81 / How to Select the Right ZTNA Solution

Gartner insights into How to Select the Right ZTNA offering. Download this FREE report for a limited time only.

Practice Labs

Practice Labs

Practice Labs is an IT competency hub, where live-lab environments give access to real equipment for hands-on practice of essential cybersecurity skills.

Clayden Law

Clayden Law

Clayden Law advise global businesses that buy and sell technology products and services. We are experts in information technology, data privacy and cybersecurity law.

CSI Consulting Services

CSI Consulting Services

Get Advice From The Experts: * Training * Penetration Testing * Data Governance * GDPR Compliance. Connecting you to the best in the business.

Promon

Promon

Promon is an application security vendor providing Self-Protection abilities to Mobile apps and Desktop applications.

CDNetworks

CDNetworks

CDNetworks is a global content delivery network with a fully integrated cloud security solution, offering unparalleled speed, security and reliability for the almost instant delivery of web content.

ABL Cyber Academy

ABL Cyber Academy

ABL provide certified training courses in the field of cyber security and IT project management.

Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems Center (iCyPhy)

Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems Center (iCyPhy)

The goal of iCyPhy is to conduct pre-competitive research on architectures and design, modeling, and analysis techniques for cyber-physical systems.

ElcomSoft

ElcomSoft

ElcomSoft is a global leader in computer and mobile forensics, IT security and forensic data recovery.

Rogue Wave Software

Rogue Wave Software

At Rogue Wave, our mission is to simplify your hardest problems, improve software quality and security, and shorten the time it takes to deliver value.

TechCERT

TechCERT

TechCERT is Sri Lanka’s first and largest Computer Emergency Readiness Team (CERT).

QOMPLX

QOMPLX

QOMPLX integrate, contextualize, and analyze data from virtually any source to help you identify operational risk and inefficiencies throughout the enterprise.

Infodas

Infodas

Infodas provides Cybersecurity and IT consulting / system integration services as well as a range of innovative Cybersecurity products to public sector and commercial clients.

Kleiner Perkins

Kleiner Perkins

For five decades, Kleiner Perkins has made history by partnering with some of the most ingenious and forward-thinking founders in technology and life sciences.

CWSI

CWSI

CWSI provide a full suite of enterprise mobility, security and productivity solutions to many of Ireland and the UK’s most respected organisations across a wide range of industry and public sectors.

Sentra

Sentra

Sentra is focused on improving data security practices within the cloud, mitigating the risks of damaging data leaks by providing comprehensive visibility into critical data assets.

White Tuque

White Tuque

A new way to protect your organization. White Tuque is your partner in identifying threats, understanding your risk, and ensuring your business remains resilient.

Acumera

Acumera

Acumera is a leader in managed network security, visibility and automation services.

EdgeWatch

EdgeWatch

EdgeWatch is a platform that helps information accredited security practitioners discover, monitor, and analyze devices that are accessible from the Internet.

ABM Technology Group

ABM Technology Group

ABM Technology Group (formerly True IT) provide business information technology services, solutions, and consulting for small to mid-sized organizations.