Social Media Reaction To The London Terror Attack

As is increasingly the norm in countries where nearly everyone carries a smartphone, the first news of the terror attack that killed seven and wounded dozens at London Bridge and Borough Market on May 3rd, Saturday night, emerged on social media.

But the posts which spread during and immediately after the attack, in particular on Twitter where breaking news tends to travel quickest, featured less disinformation, gore and panic than we have become used to. 

One explanation may simply be down to the attack's location near the offices of major news organisations, including the Times and Sun, and in an area where a number of journalists from other outlets were eating and drinking.
"There was less fake news and disinformation floating around the Internet last night than in the aftermath of the Manchester Arena terror attack," says BuzzFeed News political editor Jim Waterson, who monitored disinformation through the night.
"Partly this was due to the large number of experienced journalists who happened to be already on the ground or were themselves eyewitnesses, meaning the initial reports on Twitter turned out to be fairly accurate."

The nature of the attack, targeting pedestrians with a van followed by stabbings, and the police response, may also have played a part in reducing the number of gory and distressing images that emerged. With many bystanders running from the attackers and the area swiftly cleared and cordoned off, there were fewer opportunities to take pictures of the injured.
"We generally see less social media footage from eyewitnesses in active situations with multiple attackers than we do during bombings," says Alastair Reid, a social media journalist at the Press Association. "This may be because people are quite literally running for their lives while terrorists are still on the loose."

Another moderating influence was the Metropolitan Police Twitter account, which accompanied rapid updates on the situation with pleas for people to stick to verified facts and show restraint in what they shared. It also issued advice to anyone caught up in the attacks, including an image urging people to Run, Hide and Tell, which was picked up by broadcast media.

The message, based on best practice guidelines developed by terror experts, may not have reached as many people as broadcasts about how to respond to bomb alerts in the 1980s and '90s, or the "Protect and Survive" pamphlets and infomercials about what to do in a nuclear attack produced during the Cold War. But it was shared many tens of thousands of times, and for those near the scene using their phones to find out what was happening it would have been hard to miss. 

Another possible reason for the change in behaviour is in some ways the most encouraging - users are learning from previous terror attacks. 
“Sadly, a lot of people on social media also probably learned their lessons from the Manchester attack where a genuine desire to help by retweeting supposedly positive messages or appeals for missing people turned out to be simply boosting trolls," says Waterson. 
"It might not seem the most important thing to be worrying about online hoaxes in the middle of a terrorist attack but speedy debunking is crucial if we want to stop lies taking hold and avoid the narrative of events being hijacked."
Reid says the trend stretches back further: "The amount of misinformation around breaking news events has gone down over the last few years. It's still an issue, but nothing compared to what we saw during the Paris attacks in 2015 and the Brussels attacks last year. 
"People still create it and try to share it, but regular social media users are far quicker to condemn the hoaxers and not share them further than to just reflexively hit retweet." 

Of course there were still trolls making false claims about missing relatives and deliberately misidentifying suspects following the attack. But in the first few hours of this latest atrocity, there was a hint of how social media could be a tool for sharing information that helps, rather than hinders, our response to terror attacks.

New Statesman

You Might Also Read: 

ISIS Social Media Ops Are Declining:

London Police Chief Says Spy Agencies Face Terror Fight:

Cities Face Multiple Security Threats:

Open Source Intelligence Can Predict Terrorist Attacks:

 

 

« Five Pitfalls of Cybersecurity Insurance
Protect Yourself Against Ransomware »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

The PC Support Group

The PC Support Group

A partnership with The PC Support Group delivers improved productivity, reduced costs and protects your business through exceptional IT, telecoms and cybersecurity services.

Practice Labs

Practice Labs

Practice Labs is an IT competency hub, where live-lab environments give access to real equipment for hands-on practice of essential cybersecurity skills.

CSI Consulting Services

CSI Consulting Services

Get Advice From The Experts: * Training * Penetration Testing * Data Governance * GDPR Compliance. Connecting you to the best in the business.

Clayden Law

Clayden Law

Clayden Law advise global businesses that buy and sell technology products and services. We are experts in information technology, data privacy and cybersecurity law.

NordLayer

NordLayer

NordLayer is an adaptive network access security solution for modern businesses — from the world’s most trusted cybersecurity brand, Nord Security. 

JLT Specialty

JLT Specialty

JLT Specialty is a leading specialist insurance broker. Services offered include Cyber Risks insurance.

BackBox Software

BackBox Software

BackBox is a leading provider of solutions for automated backup and recovery software for security and network devices.

Brainwave GRC

Brainwave GRC

Brainwave GRC is a leading European software provider focused on Identity Analytics and intelligence to strengthen IT security and compliance.

Wooxo

Wooxo

Wooxo provides business security and continuity solutions to protect business data for organisation of all sizes.

ClearDATA

ClearDATA

The ClearDATA Managed Cloud protects sensitive healthcare data using purpose-built DevOps automation, compliance and security safeguards, and healthcare expertise.

cPacket Networks

cPacket Networks

cPacket’s distributed intelligence enables network operators to proactively identify imminent issues before they negatively impact end-users.

Monegasque Digital Security Agency (AMSN)

Monegasque Digital Security Agency (AMSN)

AMSN is the national authority in charge of the security of information systems in Monaco.

Jenson Knight

Jenson Knight

Jenson Knight is a global cyber security, cloud and IT infrastructure staffing specialist.

Wontok

Wontok

Wontok deliver innovative value-added data security services that fill the gaps left in traditional security solutions.

Apptega

Apptega

Apptega is an award-Winning Cybersecurity and Compliance Platform. Our mission is to make cybersecurity and compliance easy for everyone.

Battery Ventures

Battery Ventures

Battery partners with talented founders and teams building category-defining businesses at all stages of growth.

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a global law firm. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors including the global financial services industry.

Security Discovery

Security Discovery

Stay ahead of cyber threats with Security Discovery. We offer expert consulting, comprehensive services, and a powerful vulnerability monitoring SaaS platform.

Appranix

Appranix

Appranix delivers Cloud App Resilience with app-centric entire cloud resources backup, restore, and cross-region disaster recovery.

Mother Technologies

Mother Technologies

From Datacentre to Desktop, Mother Technologies has been delivering IT Support, Telecoms, Cybersecurity and Connectivity services to businesses across Scotland and beyond since 2002.

CompassMSP

CompassMSP

CompassMSP deliver Managed IT and cybersecurity solutions designed to unleash your business's full potential.