So Much Hot Air About Virtual Currencies

Rhetoric on virtual currencies has centred on risks and threats. But the technology also has the potential to promote financial inclusion. Over the past ten years since the global financial crisis and against a background of enforcement action and increased regulatory scrutiny, banks have revisited their portfolios of clients.  By Tom Keatinge of RUSI

Often this has led to drastic action: restrictions placed on account activity, and many account holders, particularly those perceived to operate in risky environments, have faced the closure of their banking facilities and even the loss of financial access. 

The issues of this process of de-risking and de-banking have been widely reviewed and have been the focus of a range of policymaker-bodies such as the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority, the Financial Action Task Force, the Financial Stability Board (FSB, the international body that monitors and makes recommendations about the global financial system) and the G20 group of the world’s biggest economies.

NGOs and charities have been particularly adversely affected by this de-risking process. Some actors from these sectors represent a perfect storm of risk for many banks: cash-based operations, with varied governance standards, active in high-risk jurisdictions, often in close proximity to designated terrorist groups where the beneficiaries of aid might be impossible to determine in advance. 

Given such circumstances, banks’ determination to reduce their exposure to the NGO sector was understandable, but the adverse consequences for those affected (and their beneficiaries) has been significant.

Recently, the situation has improved somewhat. As banks have gained control of their financial crime compliance obligations, restoring the confidence of regulators, and their de-banking projects have subsided, those higher-risk customers, such as NGOs, are again facing a less uncertain relationship with their bankers. 

Furthermore, certain banks should be commended for their willingness to engage with the NGO community, developing dedicated teams that understand NGO governance to handle relationships and help NGO clients to maintain their financial access.

Yet problems persist. Notwithstanding the increased willingness of banks to provide account holders’ services to NGOs and to execute payments on their behalf, friction remains in the system. Money moves around the world via a chain of banks (so-called correspondent banks) which often know neither the sender of the funds, nor the intended recipient. 

While risk tolerance has increased, correspondent banks remain a bottleneck in the global financial system. As the FSB noted in March, the number of correspondent banking relationships is declining, and this in turn restricts the ability to send and receive international payments, driving some payments underground, ‘with potential adverse consequences on international trade, growth, financial inclusion, as well as the stability and integrity of the financial system’.

Some efforts are being made to reduce the risk that payments are delayed or returned. For example, increasing and standardising the information provided in payment messages, the interbank communications that instruct banks to make transfers between accounts, such as proposed in the ISO 20022, the universal financial industry’s message scheme, may help remove some frictions.

But the most effective means of removing the risk that links in the payment chain will disrupt payment flows is to remove them from the system entirely. 

NGOs are already doing this, disintermediating correspondent banks and the risk that their payments will be blocked by using cash couriers to move funds to where they are needed to support their programming. This is clearly a far from ideal solution, but is often nonetheless necessary.

Enter virtual currencies and other Blockchain-based solutions. Peer-to-peer transfers remove the need to interact with the correspondent banking network. Cash held in a bank account can be converted, via a regulated exchange, into virtual currency and transferred to the online wallet of the recipient. From there they can make purchases of required goods or be cashed out as required.

There are of course issues to address: 
Will the original bank allow the account holder to transfer cash to an exchange to buy the required virtual currency? Do the vendors of required supplies accept virtual currency? Can the recipient of the virtual currency exchange the value they receive back into fiat currency at their local bank or via a reputable agent to meet their cash flow needs? 

Nevertheless, virtual currencies offer a mechanism for moving value across borders while cutting out some intermediaries. Even marginal reductions in friction are a feature that de-risked actors such as NGOs might find useful.

Importantly, these transfers need not be secretive or anonymous as use of virtual currencies is so often portrayed. The Bitcoin blockchain allows for total transparency, allowing the flow of Bitcoin from one user to another to be observed. This transparency can also prove beneficial to NGOs as it allows them to demonstrate clearly that donated funds are being delivered to their intended recipient and that outcomes are being achieved.

However, much of the public discussion to date on virtual currencies has focused entirely on the possible downsides of the technology, with little reference to how they might improve the ability of high-risk sectors such as NGOs to obtain both reliability and transparency in international transfers.

The rhetoric surrounding virtual currencies is dominated by the risks these forms of decentralised, peer-to-peer value-transfer mechanisms represent.

The original views of the likes of J P Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon (‘it’s a fraud … it will blow up’) and Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz (‘Bitcoin ought to be outlawed’), were widely reported. Thankfully, discussion of virtual currencies is becoming more nuanced (Jamie Dimon has back-pedaled saying he regrets his initial remarks), terminology is maturing: policymakers are favouring the term crypto-assets over ‘currencies’ (which Bitcoin and the like are clearly not); crypto-assets have been added to the agenda of the G20; and supervisory authorities and policymakers are (albeit in an uncoordinated fashion) turning their attention to addressing regulatory challenges.

While this moderation of rhetoric and greater policymaker engagement is welcome, thus far there has been limited engagement with the virtues of crypto-assets, in particular, as the G20 noted at its March meeting in Buenos Aires, the ‘potential to improve the efficiency and inclusiveness of the financial system’.

Ripple, the self-styled ‘enterprise blockchain solution for global payments’ argues that payments are still stuck in the ‘disco era’ and is seeking to provide a service that competes with the incumbent payment system based on the traditional correspondent bank-based network. Several banks such as Santander and Standard Chartered are already hedging as they sign up in support of Ripple’s proposal.

Across the globe, policymakers are grappling with the banking challenges faced by those deemed ‘high risk’ by the financial sector. Working groups, such as one at the UK Home Office, have been established, and considerable time is spent in high-level forums such as the G20 and the FSB attempting to identify the issues that have led to restrictions in financial access.

But perhaps rather than trying to fix the outdated ‘disco era’ technology that supports global payments, time would be better spent on advancing the ability of new technology to render these challenges obsolete.

RUSI:   

Tom Keatinge is Director of the  Centre for Financial Crime and Security Studies at RUSI.

You Might Also Read: 

Is The US Heading Toward A Cashless Economy Via Blockchain?:

Bitcoin Developer Says Cryptocurrency Has Failed:

Banks Plan To Hoard Bitcoins:

 

 

« Get Started with Predictive Analytics
By 2020 US Immigration Will Be Digitised »

Infosecurity Europe
CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

ManageEngine

ManageEngine

As the IT management division of Zoho Corporation, ManageEngine prioritizes flexible solutions that work for all businesses, regardless of size or budget.

MIRACL

MIRACL

MIRACL provides the world’s only single step Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) which can replace passwords on 100% of mobiles, desktops or even Smart TVs.

TÜV SÜD Academy UK

TÜV SÜD Academy UK

TÜV SÜD offers expert-led cybersecurity training to help organisations safeguard their operations and data.

North Infosec Testing (North IT)

North Infosec Testing (North IT)

North IT (North Infosec Testing) are an award-winning provider of web, software, and application penetration testing.

LockLizard

LockLizard

Locklizard provides PDF DRM software that protects PDF documents from unauthorized access and misuse. Share and sell documents securely - prevent document leakage, sharing and piracy.

Parasoft

Parasoft

Parasoft is an independent software testing and software quality assurance tool and solution vendor.

National Agency for Information & Communication Technologies (ANTIC) - Cameroon

National Agency for Information & Communication Technologies (ANTIC) - Cameroon

ANTIC is responsible for regulating the activities of electronic security and regulation of the Internet in Cameroon.

Redicom

Redicom

Redicom is an independent consulting agency focusing on identity management, strong authentication and single-sign-on.

Subgraph

Subgraph

Subgraph is an open source security company, committed to making secure and usable open source computing available to everyone.

Nouveau

Nouveau

Nouveau Solutions is a specialist IT managed services company with a strategic focus on delivering cloud, infrastructure, compliance, network and security solutions.

Magix Security

Magix Security

Magix Security assesses the cyber threat, gives you visibility of how vulnerable your business is to attack, and provides cybercrime detection and prevention services.

Cyber Base

Cyber Base

Cyber Base is an Information Technology company based in Uganda providing software and hardware solutions to clients.

mPrest

mPrest

mPrest is a global provider of mission-critical monitoring and control solutions for the defense, security, utility and Industrial Internet of Things (IoT) sectors.

Elliptic

Elliptic

Elliptic solve the crucial problem of identity in cryptocurrencies, with the sole purpose of combating suspicious and criminal activity.

Aporeto

Aporeto

The Aporeto platform protects cloud applications from attack by authenticating and authorizing all communications with a cryptographically signed identity assigned to every workload.

Greenwave Systems

Greenwave Systems

Greenwave's AXON Platform enables IoT and M2M network service providers to address security, interoperability, flexibility and scalability from a single IoT platform.

Qasky

Qasky

Anhui Qasky Quantum Technology Co. Ltd. (Qasky) is a new high-tech enterprise engaged in quantum information technology industrialization in China.

Softcat

Softcat

Softcat offer a broad portfolio of IT services and solutions covering Hybrid Infrastructure, Cyber Security, Digital Workspace and IT Intelligence.

LGMS - LE Global Services

LGMS - LE Global Services

LGMS is a leading cyber security penetration testing and assessment firm in the Asia Pacific region.

B2Bcert

B2Bcert

B2BCERT one of the top companies offering ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO 22000, ISO 27001, ISO 20000,CE Marking, HACCP, and other globally accepted standards and Management solutions.

Intelidata Techedge Pvt. Ltd.

Intelidata Techedge Pvt. Ltd.

Intelidata are a Global Cyber Security Consultancy and Services firm that helps companies drive growth by minimizing risk and maximizing potential.