Signs a Board Thinks Security is Better than It Is.

While most boards of directors today consider cybersecurity risks a top concern for the companies they help govern, their true awareness of the threats may not be as good as they think, according to recent results of a Ponemon Institute survey that compared directors' perceptions to IT security executives. 

The study showed that there's a gap between how well the boards believe their charges are doing with security and the perception by security personnel in the trenches working to protect company assets. Here are some indications from the survey that boards of directors may underestimate the cybersecurity risks facing their organisations.

Even though almost three-quarters of directors report that they're charged with overseeing risk assessments and audits at their companies, they may not have the baseline knowledge necessary to really decipher information and capably lead based on these assessments. 

The survey showed that only 33 percent of board members consider themselves knowledgeable or very knowledgeable about cybersecurity. It's not surprising, then that while 70 percent of board members say they understand the security risks their organizations face, just 43 percent of IT security personnel believe their boards truly understand the cyber risk landscape.

Overconfidence Endemic To Boards

The lack of knowledge allows many directors to maintain somewhat Pollyanna-ish views about their organisation's security readiness. Approximately 59 percent of board members rate their cybersecurity governance practices as very effective. At the same time, only 18 percent of security pros also believe this to be true.

"This finding reveals the deep divide in the thinking about what constitutes effective governance practices between board members who are in charge of overall company performance and those responsible for stopping data breaches and cyber attacks," the report said.

Board Not Informed of Incidents

The disparity between breaches that board members know about versus those that IT security staff have knowledge of hints at a troubling lack of communication between the board and infosec pros.   Over half of IT security professionals reported that their organisations had experienced a breach involving theft of high-value information in the past two years. 

That's compared with just 23 percent of board members who believed the same. Furthermore, in many cases, board members are unsure if their organizations have experienced security incidents. About one in five directors say they're uncertain if their organisation experienced a cyber attack that disrupted business or IT operations in the past few years and 18 percent said they were unsure if it experienced a breach involved high-value information.

Directors Don't Ask For Security Measurables

While board members recognise the importance of cyber security, 89 percent say they recognise the reputational and marketplace impact breaches or security failures pose, they're not asking for enough information from security departments. 

In fact, only 19 percent of boards use any kind of cybersecurity metrics to keep IT accountable for maintaining an acceptable level of risk for the organisation.

Dark Reading: http://ubm.io/1Hvwnz7