Russian Hacking Fuels Return To Paper Ballots

After the “hanging chad” fiasco during the 2000 presidential recount, many states and counties switched to electronic-only voting machines to modernize their systems. Now, amid security concerns over Russian hackers targeting state voting systems in last year’s election, there’s a renewed focus on shifting to paper ballots.

In Virginia in the US, election officials decided in September to stop using paperless touch-screen machines, in an effort to safeguard against unauthorised access to the equipment and improve the security of the state’s voting system.

In Georgia, which uses electronic voting machines with no paper record, legislators are discussing getting rid of their aging equipment and using paper ballots instead. In a municipal election this November, officials will test a hybrid electronic-paper system.

“States and counties were already moving toward paper ballots before 2016,” said Katy Owens Hubler, a consultant to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). “But the Russian hacking incident has brought the spotlight to this issue.”

In September, the US Department of Homeland Security notified election officials in nearly two dozen states that their voter registration systems had been targeted by Russian hackers during the 2016 presidential election.

While the hackers failed to breach most of the systems, in Illinois, they succeeded in accessing the voter database, and nearly 90,000 records were compromised. And in Arizona, hackers stole an election employee’s username and password, but the system wasn’t compromised, according to the Arizona secretary of state.
 
The National Association of Secretaries of State said would-be attackers tried to “scan” state computer systems last year, looking for open doors into networks. The secretaries of state, who serve as chief election officials in most states, said no voter information was altered or deleted, and the intruders did not access actual voting machines or devices that tabulate results.

Electronic vs. Paper

In 2002, two years after the hanging chad debacle in Florida, Congress passed the Help America Vote Act, which provided funding to state and local officials to upgrade their voting equipment.

Many areas replaced punch card machines like those used in Florida as well as old-fashioned lever equipment with direct recording electronic (DRE) machines, which frequently are touch screens. They record the vote within the machine’s memory, and many use no paper at all.

“Lots of election officials saw the nightmare of 2000 and said, ‘I don’t want to live through a recount,’ ” said Lawrence Norden of the Brennan Center for Justice, a public policy institute at New York University Law School. “When you have a DRE, you just ask the machine to print it out again. It does away with hand recounts and the controversy.”

But computer scientists, cybersecurity experts and advocates for election integrity soon became concerned that with electronic-only technology, officials couldn’t verify that a vote was tabulated correctly because there was no paper record. They said paper ballots provided better audit and recount records.

Over the last decade, many states and counties have abandoned their electronic voting machines and turned to paper, often with equipment that tabulates the ballots using optical or digital scanners.

“It isn’t as old fashioned as people picture,” said Owens Hubler, the NCSL consultant. “It’s not a move back to hand-counting paper ballots.”

A Pew Research Center analysis of data from the Verified Voting Foundation, a nonprofit that advocates for paper ballots and election integrity, found that in 2014, nearly half of registered voters lived in jurisdictions ballots that were tabulated electronically (The Pew Research Center is funded by The Pew Charitable Trusts, which also funds Stateline).

More than a quarter lived in jurisdictions that used only electronic voting machines, most of which don’t provide a paper trail. The remaining jurisdictions used a mix of optical scanners and DRE equipment, voting by mail, or hand counting paper ballots.

Paperless Systems

Five states, Delaware, Georgia, Louisiana, New Jersey and South Carolina, still use only electronic voting machines, according to the Brennan Center’s Norden. In eight other states, including Pennsylvania and Virginia, paperless systems are used in some counties and cities, including Philadelphia.

In Virginia, one of the states Russian hackers targeted last year, that’s about to change.

In September, the state elections board decided that the 12 remaining counties and cities that still use electronic machines will no longer be able to do so.

Virginia Department of Elections Commissioner Edgardo Cortés said the board was concerned there was no independent means to validate election results with a paperless system. The Russian hacking incident, which didn’t breach Virginia’s voter registration database and only scanned public websites, was a confirmation of why beefing up security is so important, he added.

“The fact that there is an ongoing attempt to undermine the election process was a big factor in our determination to get rid of paperless equipment,” he said.

Cortes said it would cost local governments in the ballpark of $1.9 million to switch to paper and optical scanners, not including startup costs, printing ballots and training election workers.

In many states and counties, money has been the biggest impediment to switching voting equipment from electronic to paper.

The Brennan Center estimates it would cost $130 million to $400 million to replace all paperless machines.

“Funding is a huge problem. The question is who is responsible for paying for elections in the United States?” Norden said. “The counties don’t have the money. The states are saying it’s not our job to fund new equipment. And the federal government is saying it’s not our responsibility either.”

That attitude may be changing on Capitol Hill, however. Bipartisan proposals in Congress that would provide funding to help pay for new voting equipment are being seriously discussed for the first time in years, said Norden, who authored a June report outlining how election officials can protect voting technology from foreign interference.

“The Russian hacking incidents in 2016 have made a difference,” he said. “There’s more interest in Congress in this issue than there has been in a decade.”

PEW:

You Might Also Read:

Russian Hacking Went Far Beyond US Election:

Was The German Election Hacked?:


 
 

« News E-models For Quality Journalism
Insurance Will Reduce Cyber Losses »

Infosecurity Europe
CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Directory of Cyber Security Suppliers

Directory of Cyber Security Suppliers

Our Supplier Directory lists 7,000+ specialist cyber security service providers in 128 countries worldwide. IS YOUR ORGANISATION LISTED?

Alvacomm

Alvacomm

Alvacomm offers holistic VIP cybersecurity services, providing comprehensive protection against cyber threats. Our solutions include risk assessment, threat detection, incident response.

ManageEngine

ManageEngine

As the IT management division of Zoho Corporation, ManageEngine prioritizes flexible solutions that work for all businesses, regardless of size or budget.

The PC Support Group

The PC Support Group

A partnership with The PC Support Group delivers improved productivity, reduced costs and protects your business through exceptional IT, telecoms and cybersecurity services.

Practice Labs

Practice Labs

Practice Labs is an IT competency hub, where live-lab environments give access to real equipment for hands-on practice of essential cybersecurity skills.

Renaissance

Renaissance

Renaissance is Ireland's premier value added distributor of IT security solutions and a leading independent provider of business continuity consultancy.

Bishop Fox

Bishop Fox

Bishop Fox is a leading authority in offensive security, providing solutions ranging from continuous penetration testing and attack surface management to product and application security assessments.

360Logica

360Logica

360Logica is a software testing company offering numerous kinds of testing services to improve the quality and performance of your software and IT systems.

Intrusion

Intrusion

Intrusion provides IT professionals with the most robust tool set available for performing in-depth research and analysis of network traffic.

Core Security

Core Security

Core Security provides threat-aware identity, access, authentication and vulnerability management solutions.

SHIELD

SHIELD

SHIELD is an established end-to-end fraud management solution that blocks fraudulent activities such as account takeovers, fake accounts creation, fraudulent payments, loyalty fraud and more.

CNS Group

CNS Group

CNS Group provides industry leading cyber security though managed security services, penetration testing, consulting and compliance.

IPification

IPification

IPification is a highly secure, credential-less, network-based authentication solution for frictionless user experience on mobile and IoT devices.

Threat Status

Threat Status

Threat Status are a Threat Intelligence company. We are the developers of Trillion. A cloud based Security As A Service (SaaS) platform.

Lewis Brisbois

Lewis Brisbois

Lewis Brisbois offers legal practice in more than 40 specialties, and a multitude of sub-specialties including Data Privacy & Cybersecurity.

Mindsight

Mindsight

Mindsight is a technology consulting firm with expertise from cybersecurity to cloud, disaster recovery to infrastructure, and collaboration to contact center.

Tyler Technologies

Tyler Technologies

Tyler Technologies is a leading provider of end-to-end information management solutions and services for local governments.

Netgo

Netgo

Netgo group meet the requirements of a complex, digitized world with IT consulting, IT solutions & services, managed & cloud services and software products & development.

DigitalPlatforms

DigitalPlatforms

DigitalPlatforms SpA is an Italian group with the mission of providing end-to-end solutions and Internet of Things and Cyber technologies to companies that manage critical infrastructures.

ArmorPoint

ArmorPoint

ArmorPoint redefines the traditional approach to cybersecurity by combining network operations, security operations, and SIEM technology in one platform.

Ethnos Cyber

Ethnos Cyber

Ethnos Cyber is Africa’s leading cybersecurity and compliance management company. We provide Information Security, Risk Management, Cybersecurity and Compliance Management solutions to clients.