Russia Is Building Killer Robots

Arms control advocates had reason for hope when scores of countries met at the United Nations in Geneva last week to discuss the future of lethal autonomous weapons systems, or LAWS

Unlike previous meetings, this one involved a Group of Governmental Experts, a big bump in diplomatic formality and consequence, and those experts had a mandate to better define lethal autonomy in weapons. 

But hopes for even a small first step toward restricting “killer robots” were dashed as the meeting unfolded. Russia announced that it would adhere to no international ban, moratorium or regulation on such weapons. 

Complicating the issue, the meeting was run in a way that made any meaningful progress toward defining (and thus eventually regulating) LAWS nearly impossible. Multiple attendees pointed out that that played directly toward Russia’s interests.

Russia’s Nov. 10 statement amounts to a lawyerly attempt to undermine any progress toward a ban. It argues that defining “lethal autonomous robots” is too hard, not yet necessary, and a threat to legitimate technology development.
“According to the Russian Federation, the lack of working samples of such weapons systems remains the main problem in the discussion on LAWS…this can hardly be considered as an argument for taking preventive prohibitive or restrictive measures against LAWS being a by far more complex and wide class of weapons of which the current understanding of humankind is rather approximate,” it says and goes on to warn that too much effort to ban lethal robots could have an unintended chilling effect on AI generally. 
“The difficulty of making a clear distinction between civilian and military developments of autonomous systems based on the same technologies is still an essential obstacle in the discussion on LAWS. It is hardly acceptable for the work on LAWS to restrict the freedom to enjoy the benefits of autonomous technologies being the future of humankind.”
An attendee who did not feel comfortable providing a name on the record, given the highly sensitive nature of the talks, said that “the Russians are not interested in making progress on this.” When asked if the lack of progress during the meeting, an effect of the unusual way the meeting was run, seemed to serve Russia’s interests, the participant responded: “Yes, of course.”

Multiple attendees put much of the blame for that on Indian Ambassador Amandeep Singh Gil, the chairperson of the Group of Governmental Experts, essentially, the UN official sanctioned to run the meeting. In both Gil’s comments and in a position paper he put forward, he echoed aspects of the Russian position.

More importantly, Gil approached the entire five-day meeting in such a way that any made any progress toward defining and thus, perhaps one day, regulating, killer robots very difficult, they said. Rather than look at serious proposals and position papers put forward by governmental delegations, Gil presided over a chaotic and ultimately inconsequential discussion of AI generally, barely touching on the stated purpose of the meeting during the five days.

At one point, he even shut down ambassadors and delegates who tried to turn the meeting back to the work of defining lethal robots. “A lot states came prepared to talk about definitions. That’s what the mandate was” said one participant. 
For a governmental delegation “to put out a position paper like that, it has to get vetted through a lot of parts of your government… it was discouraging. It’s important that States feel like they’re vested in the process.” That didn’t happen, said the participant.

Russian defense contractors, notably Kalashnikov, are already marketing weapons with artificial intelligence features such as autonomous targeting and firing. Defining a killer robot doesn’t seem to be an obstacle when the objective is selling them.
“One of the things that’s a bit incongruous about Russia’s position is that their own defense companies have made claims about developing autonomous weapons: So while you have Russia saying ‘we shouldn’t talk about these weapons because they don’t exist,’ it sure looks like Russian companies are racing to develop them,” said Paul Scharre, a senior fellow and director of the Technology and National Security Program at the Center for a New American Security. 

Scharre is also the author of the forthcoming book, Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War

He pointed to numerous instances where Russian commanders had essentially announced both the intent and the willingness to develop the sorts of weapons that they can’t define. “I would like to hear Russia clarify its position and intentions. The United States has a detailed policy in place on how it intends to approach the issue of autonomous weapons,” he said.

But Sam Bendett, an associate research analyst with the Center for Naval Analyses’ Russia Studies Program and a fellow in Russia Studies at the American Foreign Policy Council, argued that the Russian position was more nuanced than the strongest language in their statement suggests.
“Russians are also unsure how exactly AI-driven military robotics systems would function given that artificial intelligence in a battlefield capacity is still an evolving concept,” he said.

But Bendett’s work also documents growing Russian interest in developing and fielding weapons that use increasingly sophisticated AI.

In 2014, the Russian Ministry of Defense launched a comprehensive plan for the development of prospective military robotics through 2025.

In 2016 the Russians launched an annual conference, “Roboticization of the Armed Forces Of the Russian Federation.” Bendett believes that Russian defense spending in AI will grow since the Ministry of Defense has at least 10 research centers looking at applications for autonomy in warfare. And of course Russian President Vladimir Putin has even said that the nation that leads in AI will rule the world.

“Russia taking a defensive stance against an international body seeking to regulate weapons other than destructive nuclear bombs should not have been such a surprise. After all, in many international forums, Russia stresses the ‘sovereignty of nations free to pursue their own political/military/economic course’ as a cornerstone of an international order they envision as a better alternative to the unipolar world with the United States in the lead,” said Bendett

DefenseOne:

You Might Also Read: 

Artificial Intelligence, Robotics & All Tomorrows Wars:

'Killer Robot' Warfare Is Coming Closer:

Robots Could Join the Ukrainian Conflict:

Mini Robots Support Soldiers:

« The US National Security Agency Is On The Ropes
3D Mapping Can Locate Survivors In Burning Buildings »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Practice Labs

Practice Labs

Practice Labs is an IT competency hub, where live-lab environments give access to real equipment for hands-on practice of essential cybersecurity skills.

Syxsense

Syxsense

Syxsense brings together endpoint management and security for greater efficiency and collaboration between IT management and security teams.

Resecurity, Inc.

Resecurity, Inc.

Resecurity is a cybersecurity company that delivers a unified platform for endpoint protection, risk management, and cyber threat intelligence.

Cyber Security Supplier Directory

Cyber Security Supplier Directory

Our Supplier Directory lists 6,000+ specialist cyber security service providers in 128 countries worldwide. IS YOUR ORGANISATION LISTED?

North Infosec Testing (North IT)

North Infosec Testing (North IT)

North IT (North Infosec Testing) are an award-winning provider of web, software, and application penetration testing.

Voyager Networks

Voyager Networks

Voyager Networks is an IT solutions business with a focus on Enterprise Networks, Security and Collaborative Communications.

Cybsecurity Foundation (CSF)

Cybsecurity Foundation (CSF)

Cybsecurity is a non-profit NGO, which aims to work on improvement of security levels in the Polish cyberspace.

Redscan Cyber Security

Redscan Cyber Security

Redscan Cyber Security is a Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP) that enables businesses to effectively manage their information security risks.

Softtek

Softtek

Softtek provides comprehensive software Quality Assurance and Testing that identifies the correctness, completeness, and quality level of software products.

Cofense

Cofense

Cofense (formerly PhishMe) is a leading provider of human-driven phishing defense solutions.

ThetaRay

ThetaRay

ThetaRay’s solution for Industrial cyber security protects against unknown cyber-attacks that target industry and critical infrastructure.

Maryman & Associates

Maryman & Associates

Maryman & Associates are specialists in computer forensic investigations, incident response and e-discovery services.

PQShield

PQShield

PQShield are specialists in Post-Quantum Cryptography. We provide quantum-secure cryptographic solutions for software, software/hardware co-design and data in transit.

Trail of Bits

Trail of Bits

Trail of Bits combine high-end security research with a real-world attacker mentality to reduce risk and fortify code.

ProLion

ProLion

ProLion provides Data Integrity solutions that ensure organisations’ data remains secure, compliant, manageable and accessible.

Labaton Sucharow

Labaton Sucharow

Standing on the horizon of law and technology, our Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice helps to protect consumers who have been harmed by businesses’ failures to safeguard their customers' data.

Saffron Networks

Saffron Networks

Saffron Networks is an ISO-certified company. We assure our clients of reliable solutions, specifically with the Security landscape and Enterprise Networking.

Somos

Somos

From voice to messaging to fraud prevention and beyond, Somos are committed to developing innovative solutions that ensure that our ability to maintain trustworthy connections never stops.

US Cyber Games

US Cyber Games

US Cyber Games is committed to inform and inspire the broader community on ways to develop tomorrow’s cybersecurity workforce.

Integrated Cyber Solutions (ICS)

Integrated Cyber Solutions (ICS)

Integrated Cyber Solutions is a managed security service provider that humanizes cybersecurity managed services to the Small-to-Medium Business (SMB) and Small-to-Medium Enterprise (SME) sectors.

Qryptonic

Qryptonic

Qryptonic pioneers next-generation cybersecurity by leveraging the unparalleled capabilities of quantum computing to defend against evolving threats.