Russia And US Offer Competing Visions Of Cyber Normality

It’s October and the United Nations General Assembly and subsidiary committees have started their work in earnest. 

As expected, Russia tabled a draft resolution seeking the General Assembly’s endorsement of an “international code of conduct for international information security,” and a resumption of the UN Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) process next year. 

Somewhat less expected, however, is that the United States tabled a competing resolution, setting up a clash between Russia, China, and their largely autocratic friends on one side, and the United States, the European Union, Canada, Japan, and Australia on the other. 

First, some Background 

Almost every year since 1998, Russia has sponsored a General Assembly resolution called “Developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security.” It’s the mechanism through which UN member states express concern that malicious activity in cyberspace can undermine international peace and security. 

It’s also the resolution that created the GGEs on cybersecurity. Three of those GGEs led to consensus reports that recommended states abide by a set of norms, including the applicability of international law to cyberspace, participate in confidence building measures, and support capacity building initiatives to reduce the risk that state actions in cyberspace threaten international peace and security.

The text of the resolution has not been made public, but it is likely to be a combination of existing cyber norms the GGE agreed to in 2013 and 2015 and previous iterations of another code of conduct members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) proposed in 2011 and 2015. 

The inclusion of the SCO language will make the United States and like-minded countries balk given its negative human rights implications. 

Nevertheless, the proposed Russian resolution could probably be salvaged through negotiation that strips it of the SCO code’s worst elements, keeps the consensus GGE language, and mandates the creation of a new GGE to pick up where the last one fell apart.

The text of the proposed Russian resolution is now public, and it’s about as expected. It cherry picks some of the worst elements from the previous Codes (e.g. promotes concepts of “cyber sovereignty,” sidelines the role of the private sector, etc.), un-ironically bemoans the spread of disinformation online, and mis-characterises previous consensus GGE text. 

It also calls for a new GGE with the mandate of identifying ways to implement the new code of conduct, make changes as necessary, and to study the possibility of establishing an “institutional dialogue” on cyber issues within the United Nations. 

The United States must have deemed the Russian text unsalvageable because it proposed its own competing resolution, backed by EU countries, Canada, Australia, and a few others. It applauds the work of the previous GGEs, calls on member states to abide by the previous reports’ recommendations, and requests a new GGE be established with largely the same mandate as previous ones.

Contrary to previous iterations, however, the United States asks that whatever report comes from the new GGE should include an annex “containing national contributions of participating governmental experts on the subject of how international law applies to the use of information and communication technologies by States.” 

The United States started laying out its understanding of how international law applies online in the Obama administration (here and here), and has encouraged countries to do the same. Earlier this year, the UK Attorney General laid out his country’s views on the matter. 

By pushing for an annex in the GGE report, the United States is trying to get Russia, China, and others on the record, particularly salient for China as it has remained silent on whether international humanitarian law applies online. 

I’m not a UN process expert, so it’s hard to say how this will play out. But if I were a betting man, I’d put my money on the US approach coming out on top. As an institution, the United Nations prefers incrementalism over radical change. 

That makes it much harder for Russia, China and the rest of the SCO members to drum up support for a twenty-five paragraph code of conduct that contains vague language mostly unfamiliar to many states. 

By contrast, the US resolution has more similarities to Russia’s previous resolutions, an advantage given that they will be familiar to diplomats at the UN who prefer sticking to previously agreed text. 

No matter what happens as diplomats haggle over the particulars of the resolution, expect a new GGE next year. The only open question at this point is its mandate, and that should be made clear in the next few weeks. 

Defense One:

You Might Also Read:

Cyberattack Revelations Appear To Undercut Russia's UN Efforts:

Russia Will Build A Separate Internet Directory:

The US Is Losing the Information War To Russia

« IBM Spends $34B To Buy Red Hat
British Refuse To Co-operate With Belgian Hacking Inquiry »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO is the market leader in HPE Non-Stop Security, Risk Management and Compliance.

Alvacomm

Alvacomm

Alvacomm offers holistic VIP cybersecurity services, providing comprehensive protection against cyber threats. Our solutions include risk assessment, threat detection, incident response.

ON-DEMAND WEBINAR: What Is A Next-Generation Firewall (and why does it matter)?

ON-DEMAND WEBINAR: What Is A Next-Generation Firewall (and why does it matter)?

Watch this webinar to hear security experts from Amazon Web Services (AWS) and SANS break down the myths and realities of what an NGFW is, how to use one, and what it can do for your security posture.

North Infosec Testing (North IT)

North Infosec Testing (North IT)

North IT (North Infosec Testing) are an award-winning provider of web, software, and application penetration testing.

Clayden Law

Clayden Law

Clayden Law advise global businesses that buy and sell technology products and services. We are experts in information technology, data privacy and cybersecurity law.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub enables developers to build secure realtime Mobile, Web, and IoT Apps.

Towergate Insurance

Towergate Insurance

Towergate Insurance is a leading UK specialist insurance broker. Business products include Cyber Liability Insurance.

Software Engineering Institute (SEI)

Software Engineering Institute (SEI)

At the CERT Division of SEI we study and solve cybersecurity problems, research security vulnerabilities in software, and develop information and training to help improve cybersecurity.

Baffle

Baffle

Baffle is pioneering a solution that makes data breaches irrelevant by keeping data encrypted from production through processing.

Cyber Triage

Cyber Triage

Cyber Triage is an automated incident response software any company can use to investigate their network alerts.

IdenTrust

IdenTrust

IdenTrust enables organizations to effectively manage the risks associated with identity authentication.

Nok Nok Labs

Nok Nok Labs

Nok Nok is a market leader in next generation authentication for cloud, mobile and IoT applications.

Data Security Inc

Data Security Inc

Data Security, Inc. is the leading American manufacturer and supplier of hard drive degaussers, magnetic tape degaussers as well as hard drive and solid state destruction devices.

Symptai Consulting

Symptai Consulting

Symptai Consulting is a leading Cyber Security, Digital Transformation and Anti-Money Laundering firm serving the Caribbean and the wider world.

UNS Inc.

UNS Inc.

UNS is a top services partner for multiple leaders in the global cybersecurity industry – we do business in 40 countries, including the United States, Canada, Chile, and Colombia.

SoftwareONE

SoftwareONE

SoftwareONE is a leading global provider of end-to-end software and cloud technology solutions.

Fibernet

Fibernet

Fibernet's innovative solutions in the fields of cybersecurity and fiber optics range from telecommunications infrastructure to small business cybersecurity.

ITC Federal

ITC Federal

ITC Federal delivers IT cybersecurity assessment services to support agencies in meeting their security strategies and federal security compliance goals.

Buguard

Buguard

Buguard is a multi-award-winning supplier of Application Security Assessments and GRC services.

AuthenticID

AuthenticID

Our mission at AuthenticID is to combat fraud worldwide and help businesses protect their enterprise and valuable data assets.

Siguria Kibernetike (Cyber Security)

Siguria Kibernetike (Cyber Security)

Siguria Kibernetike is a company based in Tirana that offers full service in the field of cyber and physical security.