Russia And US Offer Competing Visions Of Cyber Normality

It’s October and the United Nations General Assembly and subsidiary committees have started their work in earnest. 

As expected, Russia tabled a draft resolution seeking the General Assembly’s endorsement of an “international code of conduct for international information security,” and a resumption of the UN Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) process next year. 

Somewhat less expected, however, is that the United States tabled a competing resolution, setting up a clash between Russia, China, and their largely autocratic friends on one side, and the United States, the European Union, Canada, Japan, and Australia on the other. 

First, some Background 

Almost every year since 1998, Russia has sponsored a General Assembly resolution called “Developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security.” It’s the mechanism through which UN member states express concern that malicious activity in cyberspace can undermine international peace and security. 

It’s also the resolution that created the GGEs on cybersecurity. Three of those GGEs led to consensus reports that recommended states abide by a set of norms, including the applicability of international law to cyberspace, participate in confidence building measures, and support capacity building initiatives to reduce the risk that state actions in cyberspace threaten international peace and security.

The text of the resolution has not been made public, but it is likely to be a combination of existing cyber norms the GGE agreed to in 2013 and 2015 and previous iterations of another code of conduct members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) proposed in 2011 and 2015. 

The inclusion of the SCO language will make the United States and like-minded countries balk given its negative human rights implications. 

Nevertheless, the proposed Russian resolution could probably be salvaged through negotiation that strips it of the SCO code’s worst elements, keeps the consensus GGE language, and mandates the creation of a new GGE to pick up where the last one fell apart.

The text of the proposed Russian resolution is now public, and it’s about as expected. It cherry picks some of the worst elements from the previous Codes (e.g. promotes concepts of “cyber sovereignty,” sidelines the role of the private sector, etc.), un-ironically bemoans the spread of disinformation online, and mis-characterises previous consensus GGE text. 

It also calls for a new GGE with the mandate of identifying ways to implement the new code of conduct, make changes as necessary, and to study the possibility of establishing an “institutional dialogue” on cyber issues within the United Nations. 

The United States must have deemed the Russian text unsalvageable because it proposed its own competing resolution, backed by EU countries, Canada, Australia, and a few others. It applauds the work of the previous GGEs, calls on member states to abide by the previous reports’ recommendations, and requests a new GGE be established with largely the same mandate as previous ones.

Contrary to previous iterations, however, the United States asks that whatever report comes from the new GGE should include an annex “containing national contributions of participating governmental experts on the subject of how international law applies to the use of information and communication technologies by States.” 

The United States started laying out its understanding of how international law applies online in the Obama administration (here and here), and has encouraged countries to do the same. Earlier this year, the UK Attorney General laid out his country’s views on the matter. 

By pushing for an annex in the GGE report, the United States is trying to get Russia, China, and others on the record, particularly salient for China as it has remained silent on whether international humanitarian law applies online. 

I’m not a UN process expert, so it’s hard to say how this will play out. But if I were a betting man, I’d put my money on the US approach coming out on top. As an institution, the United Nations prefers incrementalism over radical change. 

That makes it much harder for Russia, China and the rest of the SCO members to drum up support for a twenty-five paragraph code of conduct that contains vague language mostly unfamiliar to many states. 

By contrast, the US resolution has more similarities to Russia’s previous resolutions, an advantage given that they will be familiar to diplomats at the UN who prefer sticking to previously agreed text. 

No matter what happens as diplomats haggle over the particulars of the resolution, expect a new GGE next year. The only open question at this point is its mandate, and that should be made clear in the next few weeks. 

Defense One:

You Might Also Read:

Cyberattack Revelations Appear To Undercut Russia's UN Efforts:

Russia Will Build A Separate Internet Directory:

The US Is Losing the Information War To Russia

« IBM Spends $34B To Buy Red Hat
British Refuse To Co-operate With Belgian Hacking Inquiry »

Infosecurity Europe
CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO is the market leader in HPE Non-Stop Security, Risk Management and Compliance.

ManageEngine

ManageEngine

As the IT management division of Zoho Corporation, ManageEngine prioritizes flexible solutions that work for all businesses, regardless of size or budget.

Alvacomm

Alvacomm

Alvacomm offers holistic VIP cybersecurity services, providing comprehensive protection against cyber threats. Our solutions include risk assessment, threat detection, incident response.

MIRACL

MIRACL

MIRACL provides the world’s only single step Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) which can replace passwords on 100% of mobiles, desktops or even Smart TVs.

LockLizard

LockLizard

Locklizard provides PDF DRM software that protects PDF documents from unauthorized access and misuse. Share and sell documents securely - prevent document leakage, sharing and piracy.

Morgan Lewis Law

Morgan Lewis Law

Morgan Lewis is an international law firm with offices in North America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. Practice areas include Privacy and Cybersecurity.

Cologix

Cologix

Cologix provides reliable, secure, scalable data center and interconnection solutions from 24 prime interconnection locations across 9 strategic North American edge markets.

Xcina Consulting (XCL)

Xcina Consulting (XCL)

Xcina Consulting provides high quality business and technology risk assurance and advisory services.

7 Elements

7 Elements

7 Elements is an independent IT security testing company providing expertise in technical information assurance through security testing, incident response and consultancy.

certSIGN

certSIGN

certSIGN develop innovative software for information security and information systems protection.

Intercast Global

Intercast Global

Intercast's mission is to be a strategic resource to our clients in Risk Reduction. We are a global leader in cyber security staffing and consulting to the enterprise.

BI.ZONE

BI.ZONE

BI.ZONE creates high-tech products and solutions to protect IT infrastructures and applications, and provides services from cyber intelligence and proactive defence to cybercrime investigation.

Trust Stamp

Trust Stamp

Trust Stamp provide Identity and Trust as a Service to answer two fundamental questions: “Who are you?” and “Do I trust you?"

OISTE Foundation

OISTE Foundation

OISTE foundation allows users to control their digital identities using well-understood and secure algorithms that ensure the continued validity of an identity and its claims.

Hunter Strategy

Hunter Strategy

Hunter Strategy focuses on delivering solutions that are concise, scalable, and target our customer’s complex technical challenges.

BT Security

BT Security

BT provides telecommunications and network infrastructure services to keep businesses around the world connected and secure.

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent's SaaS GRC platform gives leaders a connected view of governance, risk, compliance and ESG across their organization.

Truvantis

Truvantis

Truvantis is a cybersecurity consulting organization providing best-in-class cybersecurity services to secure your organization’s infrastructure, data, operations and products.

CyberXposure

CyberXposure

CyberXposure has been built by a team comprising of Cyber Security Professionals and SAAS experts in data backup, disaster recovery and cyber-security.

Gleam Cloud Security Solutions (GCSS)

Gleam Cloud Security Solutions (GCSS)

GCSS Security is an information security firm providing cyber security protection with a highly skilled and experienced team focused on technology that creates best-in-class customer experiences.

SITS Group

SITS Group

SITS Group excel in delivering a comprehensive range of Cyber Security consulting and managed services, from cloud transformation to risk management.