Regulation Might Actually Protect Facebook

You know what tech startups hate? Complicated legal compliance. The problem is, Facebook isn’t a startup any more, but its competitors are.

There have been plenty of calls from the US congress and critics to regulate Facebook  following the election interference scandal and now the Cambridge Analytica debacle.

The US government could require extensive ads transparency reporting or data privacy protections. That could cost Facebook a lot of money, slow down its operations, or inhibit its ability to build new products.

But the danger is that those same requirements could be much more onerous for a tiny upstart company to uphold. Without much cash or enough employees, and with product-market fit still to nail down, young startups might be anchored by the weight of regulation.

It could prevent them from ever rising to become a true alternative to Facebook. Venture capitalists choosing whether to fund the next Facebook killer might look at the regulations as too high of a price of entry.

The lack of viable alternatives has made the #DeleteFacebook movement toothless. Where are people going to go? Instagram? WhatsApp? The government already missed its chances to stop Facebook from acquiring these companies that are massive social networks in their own right.

The only social networks to carve out communities since Facebook’s rise did so largely by being completely different, like the ephemeral Snapchat that purposefully doesn’t serve as a web identity platform, and the mostly-public Twitter that caters to thought leaders and celebrities more than normal people sharing their personal lives.

Blockchain-based decentralised social networks sound nice but may be impossible to spin up.

That’s left few places for Facebook haters to migrate. This might explain why despite having so many more users, #DeleteFacebook peaked last week at substantially fewer Twitter mentions than the big #DeleteUber campaign from last January, according to financial data dashboard Sentieo. Lyft’s existence makes #DeleteUber a tenable stance, because you don’t have to change your behavior pattern, just your brand of choice.

If the government actually wants to protect the public against Facebook abusing its power, it would need to go harder than the Honest Ads Act that would put political advertising on Internet platforms under the same scrutiny regarding disclosure of buyers as the rules for TV and radio advertising.

That’s basically just extra paperwork for Facebook. We’ve seen regulatory expenses deter competition amongst broadband internet service providers and in other industries. Real change would necessitate regulation that either creates alternatives to Facebook or at least doesn’t inhibit their creation.

That could mean only requiring certain transparency and privacy protections from apps over a certain size, like 200 million daily users. This would put the cap a bit above Twitter and Snapchat’s size today, giving them time to prepare for compliance, while immediately regulating Facebook, Messenger, Instagram, WhatsApp and Google’s social problem child, YouTube.

Still, with Facebook earning billions in profit per quarter and a massive war chest built up, Mark Zuckerberg could effectively pay his way out of the problem. That’s why it makes perfect sense for him to have told CNN “I’m not sure we shouldn’t be regulated” and that “There are things like ad transparency regulation that I would love to see.”

Particular regulatory hurdles amount to just tiny speed bumps for Facebook. Courting this level of regulation could bat down the question of whether it should be broken up or its News Feed algorithm needs to change.

Meanwhile, if the government instituted new rules for tech platforms collecting persona information going forward, it could effectively lock in Facebook’s lead in the data race. If it becomes more cumbersome to gather this kind of data, no competitor might ever amass an index of psychographic profiles and social graphs able to rival Facebook’s.

A much more consequential approach would be to break up Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. Facebook is trying to preempt these drastic measures with Zuckerberg’s recent apology tour and its purchase of full-page ads in nine newspapers today claiming it understands its responsibility.

Establishing them as truly independent companies that compete would create meaningful alternatives to Facebook. Instagram and WhatsApp would have to concern themselves with actually becoming sustainable businesses.

They’d all lose some economies of data scale, forfeiting the ability to share engineering, anti-spam, localisation, ad sales, and other resources that a source close to Instagram told me it gained by being acquired in 2012, and that Facebook later applied to WhatsApp too.

Both permanent photo sharing and messaging would become two-horse races again. That could lead to the consumer-benefiting competition and innovation the government hopes for from regulation.

Yet with strong regulation like dismantling Facebook seeming beyond the resolve of congress, and weak regulation potentially protecting Facebook, perhaps it’s losing the moral high ground that will be Facebook’s real punishment.

We’ve already seen that first-time download rates aren’t plummeting for Facebook, its App Store ranking has actually increased since the Cambridge Analytica  scandal broke, and blue chip advertisers aren’t bailing, according to BuzzFeed. But Facebook relies on the perception of its benevolent mission to recruit top talent in Silicon Valley and beyond.

Techies take the job because they wake up each day believing that they’re having a massive positive influence by connecting the world. These people could have founded or worked at a new startup where they’d have discernible input on the direction of the product, and a chance to earn huge return multiples on their stock.

Many have historically worked at Facebook because its ads say it’s the “Best place to build and make an impact”. But if workers start to see that impact as negative, they might not enlist. This is what could achieve that which surface-level regulation can’t.

It’s perhaps the most important repercussion of all the backlash about fake news, election interference, well-being, and data privacy: that losing talent could lead to a slow-down of innovation at Facebook that might leave the door open for a new challenger.

Techcrunch

You Might Also Read:

Facebook’s Influence On UK Politics:

Cambridge Analytica, Facebook & GDPR:

 

« Russian Bots Promote Fake News
IBM Watson AI Assistant Can Now Work With Autonomous Devices »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Clayden Law

Clayden Law

Clayden Law advise global businesses that buy and sell technology products and services. We are experts in information technology, data privacy and cybersecurity law.

Directory of Cyber Security Suppliers

Directory of Cyber Security Suppliers

Our Supplier Directory lists 7,000+ specialist cyber security service providers in 128 countries worldwide. IS YOUR ORGANISATION LISTED?

ZenGRC

ZenGRC

ZenGRC (formerly Reciprocity) is a leader in the GRC SaaS landscape, offering robust and intuitive products designed to make compliance straightforward and efficient.

ManageEngine

ManageEngine

As the IT management division of Zoho Corporation, ManageEngine prioritizes flexible solutions that work for all businesses, regardless of size or budget.

NordLayer

NordLayer

NordLayer is an adaptive network access security solution for modern businesses — from the world’s most trusted cybersecurity brand, Nord Security. 

Exploit Database (EDB)

Exploit Database (EDB)

The Exploit Database is a CVE compliant archive of public exploits and corresponding vulnerable software, developed for use by penetration testers and vulnerability researchers.

OSIRIS Lab - NYU Tandon

OSIRIS Lab - NYU Tandon

The Offensive Security, Incident Response & Internet Security Lab (OSIRIS) is a security research environment where students analyze and understand how attackers take advantage of real systems.

Digittrade

Digittrade

Digittrade develop and produce external encrypted hard disks and secure communications apps.

CMMI Institute

CMMI Institute

CMMI Institute enables organizations to elevate and benchmark performance across a range of critical business capabilities, including product development, data management and cybersecurity.

Beazley

Beazley

Beazley are a specialist insurer with three decades of experience in providing clients with the highest standards of underwriting and claims service worldwide.

oneM2M

oneM2M

oneM2M is a global organization creating a scalable and interoperable standard for communications of devices and services used in M2M applications and the Internet of Things.

2Keys

2Keys

2Keys designs, deploys and operates Digital Identity Platforms and Cyber Security Platforms through Managed Service and Professional Service engagements.

Blockchain Research Institute (BRI)

Blockchain Research Institute (BRI)

Blockchain Research Institute (BRI) is an independent, global think-tank. We bring together the world’s top global researchers to undertake ground-breaking research on blockchain technology.

Protocol Labs

Protocol Labs

Protocol Labs is a research, development, and deployment institution for improving Internet technology.

InsightCyber

InsightCyber

InsightCyber is on a mission to keep the world’s critical infrastructure, supply chains, and manufacturing operations cyber-safe, helping to prevent attacks that can have catastrophic impacts.

Nexor

Nexor

Nexor are a UK-based cyber security company with 30 years' experience in secure information exchange.

Privacera

Privacera

Privacera enables consistent data governance, security, and compliance across all your data services - on-premises and in the cloud - so you can maximize the value of your data.

Shearwater Group

Shearwater Group

Shearwater Group is an award-winning organisational resilience group that provides cyber security, advisory and managed security services to help secure businesses in a connected global economy.

Creative Destruction Lab (CDL)

Creative Destruction Lab (CDL)

Creative Destruction Lab is a nonprofit organization that delivers an objectives-based program for massively scalable, seed-stage, science- and technology-based companies.

V2X

V2X

V2X delivers IT support, networking, and cybersecurity solutions that ensure optimal mission support and performance.

Standard Notes

Standard Notes

Standard Notes is a secure digital notes app that protects your notes and files with audited, industry-leading end-to-end encryption.