Fear Killer Robots

2033-3.png

Despite overall opposition to allowing robots onto battlefields, most British adults (54%) expect them to be used in many battles within 20 years.

Recently, a broad group of several thousand academics, legal scholars, roboticists, and scientific luminaries – including Stephen Hawking – released an open letter warning that efforts to develop autonomous weapons could unleash a Pandora’s box of ills, from ethnic cleansing to pervasive arms races. Certainly, this is not a world in which any of us would like to live. But nor is it a world that rises inevitably from the development of autonomous weapons.  

However, on the contrary, autonomous weapons could shape a better world, one in which the fog of war thins, if ever so slightly. These systems are not subject to the fatigue, combat stress, and other factors that occasionally cloud human judgment. And if responsibly developed and properly constrained, they could ensure that missions are executed strictly according to the rules of engagement and the commander’s intent. A world with autonomous weapons could be one where the principles of international humanitarian law (IHL) are not only respected but also strengthened.

The key to avoiding the catastrophes predicted in the letter is restricting what such a weapon can and can’t do. It might, for example, be allowed to operate only for a limited time or in a limited geographic area — perhaps underwater or in other areas in which civilians are not present. This would, in turn, increase a commander’s control over the weapon and strengthen accountability for the system’s use – a key concern among advocates of a ban on autonomous weapons. These machines could also be designed to target only military hardware, thereby strengthening adherence to the IHL principles of proportionality and distinction and further reducing civilian casualties.

These positive outcomes are possible only if the international community offers careful stewardship. First and most importantly, states will need to agree upon a definition of “autonomous weapons.” At the recent UN meeting on Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems, governments and non-governmental organizations expressed widely divergent, and frequently incompatible, notions of autonomy and autonomous weapons. 

Some argued that existing systems qualify as autonomous, while others, such as the United Kingdom, argued that they “do not and may never” exist. Clarifying the definition will be critical to advancing the dialogue and to establishing responsible design requirements and operating parameters.

Second, governments must ensure that meaningful human control exists over their autonomous weapons. As Michael Horowitz and Paul Scharre have written in their primer on the subject, this should include standards that help operators make deliberate, legal, and moral decisions about the use of force.

Third, governments should implement strict testing and evaluation standards to ensure that any weapon that can autonomously pick a target or begin an engagement performs as intended, and that procedures for its use are clear to operators. In order to ensure that such systems continue to operate in accordance with their design features, governments should agree to periodic testing in realistic operating environments.

Finally, it will be essential for governments to further explore the ways in which accountability for the use of autonomous weapons can be established and enforced. While such an undertaking will be undoubtedly challenging, it will be critical in ensuring that the use of these systems adheres to IHL and reducing potential risks. 

Despite the somewhat breathless tone of the letter, its signatories draw attention to an important technological development that the international community would do well to address in a measured and calm way. Autonomous weapons will never remove the human dimension of warfare, but if we are careful, they just might thin the fog.

DefenseOne

 

 

« In The War of 2050, The Robots Call The Shots
UK MPs are No longer Exempt from Surveillance »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

LockLizard

LockLizard

Locklizard provides PDF DRM software that protects PDF documents from unauthorized access and misuse. Share and sell documents securely - prevent document leakage, sharing and piracy.

ZenGRC

ZenGRC

ZenGRC - the first, easy-to-use, enterprise-grade information security solution for compliance and risk management - offers businesses efficient control tracking, testing, and enforcement.

Clayden Law

Clayden Law

Clayden Law advise global businesses that buy and sell technology products and services. We are experts in information technology, data privacy and cybersecurity law.

Authentic8

Authentic8

Authentic8 transforms how organizations secure and control the use of the web with Silo, its patented cloud browser.

Jooble

Jooble

Jooble is a job search aggregator operating in 71 countries worldwide. We simplify the job search process by displaying active job ads from major job boards and career sites across the internet.

F-Secure

F-Secure

F-Secure defends enterprises and consumers against everything from opportunistic ransomware infections to advanced cyber attacks.

Intercede

Intercede

Intercede is a cybersecurity company specializing in digital identities, derived credentials and access control, enabling digital trust in a mobile world.

Insta Group

Insta Group

Insta are a trusted cyber security partner for security-critical companies and organizations.

Yokogawa Electric

Yokogawa Electric

Yokogawa is an electrical engineering company providing measurement, control, and information technologies including industrial cyber security.

LinkUp

LinkUp

LinkUp is a leading data-driven job search company. Every day we index millions of job openings directly from employer websites.

Drootoo

Drootoo

Drootoo is transforming businesses and making them high performing entities with its unified cloud platform.

Vivitec

Vivitec

Vivitec security services are tailored for your business, industry, risk, technology, and size to ensure great protection and planned response for the inevitable cyber-attacks on your business.

Intrepid Solutions and Services

Intrepid Solutions and Services

Intrepid Solutions and Services provides technology solutions and professional services to key components of the intelligence and national security communities.

PA Consulting

PA Consulting

PA Consulting Group is a consultancy that specialises in strategy, technology and innovation. Our cyber security experts work with you to spot digital and technology security risks and reduce them.

Secure Diversity

Secure Diversity

Secure Diversity is an innovative non-profit organization with leaders that think out of the box to create strategies & solutions to increase diversity in the cybersecurity industry.

NPCERT

NPCERT

NPCERT is a team of Information Security experts formed to address the urgent need for the protection of national information and growing cybersecurity threat in Nepal.

Papua New Guinea National Cyber Security Centre (PNG NCSC)

Papua New Guinea National Cyber Security Centre (PNG NCSC)

PNG NCSC is a jointly funded initiative enabling PNG to benefit with the most advanced cyber protection of its critical information and communications technology infrastructure.

Vercara

Vercara

Vercara offers a purpose-built, global cloud security platform that provides layers of protection to safeguard businesses’ online presence, no matter where an attack comes from or where it is aimed.

Leostream

Leostream

Leostream's Remote Desktop Access Platform enables seamless work-from-anywhere flexibility while maintaining security and constant visibility of users.

DIGISOC

DIGISOC

DIGISOC, a leader in Latin America in Cybersecurity solutions, combines machine learning with human intelligence to be effective in detecting cyber threats.

Aura Information Security

Aura Information Security

Aura Information Security consists of a team of highly-skilled and renowned information security professionals spanning Australia and New Zealand.