Germany Develops Offensive Cyber Capabilities Without A Coherent Strategy

There is a reoccurring debate in German national security and foreign policy whether Germany suffers from “Strategieunfähigkeit”, an inability to develop and implement strategy. 

The historic trauma of two lost World Wars created a pacifist culture that always struggled with formulating national security interests and defining strategy. 

The so-called “culture of reluctance” regarding the use of hard power has bled into Berlin’s thinking about cyber issues, especially as it rushes to develop capabilities without an overarching strategy on how to use them. Until recently, Germany has prioritised defense over offense in cyberspace. 

The Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Germany’s cybersecurity agency, has a strictly non-military defensive mandate and is a vigilant advocate of strong encryption and full disclosure of zero-day vulnerabilities to vendors. 

Germany’s foreign intelligence agency (BND) has historically had a relatively small cyber espionage budget.

Germany’s defensive posture began to shift in 2015, after the internal network of the German Bundestag was successfully compromised by Russian state-backed operators. That led the country to revise its cybersecurity strategy, issuing a more offensive-minded document in 2016. It called for the development of cyber teams in the intelligence agencies. 

It also might have been a contributing factor to the creation of a specialised agency, called the Central Office for Information Technology in the Security Sphere (ZITiS), to develop innovative techniques to break into encrypted devices, develop exploits and malware for real time interception and accessing data at rest, as well as identify or purchase zero-days to support offensive capabilities.

As Germany rolled out its 2016 strategy, the German military (Bundeswehr) centralised its cyber capacity by consolidating around 14,000 soldiers and IT personnel into a unified cyber command (CIR), loosely modelled on US Cyber Command. CIR wants to achieve full operational capacity by the early 2020s and plans to perform strategic and tactical cyber operations against enemy assets. 
Usage scenarios include disrupting enemy military assets, battlefield support and reconnaissance on adversary IT assets.

Through the new strategy, the meaning of cybersecurity in Germany shifted from strengthening IT-security to improving public safety through the use of offensive cyber operations.

Berlin’s latest move favoring offensive cyber activity is the creation of a cyber innovation agency, akin to the United States’ DARPA, announced in August 2018. Its mandate is to conduct market research and sponsor promising projects with potential value for cyber offense and cybersecurity. 

Over the next five years, the agency is supposed to be equipped with a budget of €200 million (roughly $227 million), 80 percent of which will fund research projects, a substantial sum considering that the entire budget of the BSI is only €120 million per year.

These developments over the last three years point to a build-up of Germany’s offensive cyber capability. Interestingly, these new capabilities have been created without having a clearly defined strategic purpose, a problem that has plagued German national security policy in the past. 

For example, during the 2001 NATO mission in Afghanistan, Bundeswehr capabilities, designed for territorial defense from invasion, was not well adapted or flexible enough for an expeditionary mission.

This mismatch between strategy and capabilities plagues Berlin’s approach to cyberspace. There is currently no strategic debate about what German policymakers want to achieve with its new offensive capabilities. Questions about attribution and appropriate responses have apparently not yet been discussed. 

It is further unclear whether the political will exists to use these offensive capabilities in a time of crisis. For example, if deterring cyberattacks by punishment is a goal, strategy should make clear what means, including non-cyber options, would be most suitable. Is offensive cyber activity more useful in deterring adversarial cyber operations as say indictments or economic sanctions? 

Currently government officials seem to simply assume that cyber capabilities alone have a deterrent effect without taking into consideration the strategic requirements that come with deterrence by punishment, namely credibly holding assets at risk and signaling desired behavior while being willing to face consequences in case of an escalation. 

Will Germany indeed launch a retaliatory cyberattack against adversaries that provoke it and in turn face the potential consequences of entering an escalation cycle with, say, Russia or China?

As Germany tries to flex its muscles in cyberspace, allies and adversaries alike will be left to wonder what to expect absent an overall strategy. 

German policymakers should start a strategic discussion about the country’s role in a contested cyberspace. It needs to explain to its allies how its new offensive tools will work to support multilateral frameworks like NATO, the EU and the UN. 

Germany also needs to signal to hostile cyber actors what behavior it deems inappropriate, and how it will likely respond if certain red-lines are crossed.

Council on Foreign Relations:

You Might Also Read:

Germany Wants A Legal Framework For Cyberwar

« Review Your Cybersecurity Awareness
Cybercrime Is The Biggest Evolving Source Of Crime In The UK »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

LockLizard

LockLizard

Locklizard provides PDF DRM software that protects PDF documents from unauthorized access and misuse. Share and sell documents securely - prevent document leakage, sharing and piracy.

Cyber Security Supplier Directory

Cyber Security Supplier Directory

Our Supplier Directory lists 6,000+ specialist cyber security service providers in 128 countries worldwide. IS YOUR ORGANISATION LISTED?

Perimeter 81 / How to Select the Right ZTNA Solution

Perimeter 81 / How to Select the Right ZTNA Solution

Gartner insights into How to Select the Right ZTNA offering. Download this FREE report for a limited time only.

The PC Support Group

The PC Support Group

A partnership with The PC Support Group delivers improved productivity, reduced costs and protects your business through exceptional IT, telecoms and cybersecurity services.

MIRACL

MIRACL

MIRACL provides the world’s only single step Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) which can replace passwords on 100% of mobiles, desktops or even Smart TVs.

Cysec Resource Co (CRC)

Cysec Resource Co (CRC)

We offer expertise in information and cyber security, sourcing individuals and teams who provide information security expertise to the public and private sector.

QA Systems

QA Systems

QA Systems provides software testing solutions for safety and business critical sectors and software safety and security standards.

Minerva Labs

Minerva Labs

Minerva’s patent pending solution keeps malware in a constant sleep state before it can infiltrate your network and cause any damage.

VdS

VdS

VdS is an independent safety and security testing institution. Cybersecurity services include standards, audit/assessment and certification for SMEs.

Ekran System

Ekran System

Ekran System is an advanced insider threat detection solution for companies of any size.

Featurespace

Featurespace

Featurespace is a world-leader in Adaptive Behavioural Analytics and creator of the ARIC platform for fraud and risk management.

CSI Consulting Services

CSI Consulting Services

Get Advice From The Experts: * Training * Penetration Testing * Data Governance * GDPR Compliance. Connecting you to the best in the business.

Base Cyber Security

Base Cyber Security

Base Cyber Security is an information and cyber security talent service provider and career specialist.

AiCULUS

AiCULUS

AiCULUS is a global technology company that specializes in API security and Risk Management products.

Whistic

Whistic

Whistic is a cloud-based platform that uses a unique approach to address the challenges of third-party risk management.

ITTAS

ITTAS

ITTAS is a multidisciplinary company specializing in information security and software and hardware protection software.

Unit21

Unit21

Unit21 helps protect businesses against adversaries through a simple API and dashboard for detecting and managing money laundering, fraud, and other sophisticated risks across multiple industries.

Zephyr Project

Zephyr Project

The Zephyr Project strives to deliver the best-in-class RTOS for connected resource-constrained devices, built to be secure and safe.

Great American Insurance Group

Great American Insurance Group

Great American's Cyber Risk Division offers cyber solutions for small and medium-sized businesses.

Arcanna.ai

Arcanna.ai

Using a wide range of out-of-the box integrations, Arcanna.ai continuously learns from existing enterprise cybersecurity experts and scales your team’s capacity to deal with threats.

Hydden

Hydden

Hydden gives security teams the ability to create a solid foundation to build a truly next-gen identity security practice by bridging the gaps between siloed teams and technologies.