Fear Killer Robots

2033-3.png

Despite overall opposition to allowing robots onto battlefields, most British adults (54%) expect them to be used in many battles within 20 years.

Recently, a broad group of several thousand academics, legal scholars, roboticists, and scientific luminaries – including Stephen Hawking – released an open letter warning that efforts to develop autonomous weapons could unleash a Pandora’s box of ills, from ethnic cleansing to pervasive arms races. Certainly, this is not a world in which any of us would like to live. But nor is it a world that rises inevitably from the development of autonomous weapons.  

However, on the contrary, autonomous weapons could shape a better world, one in which the fog of war thins, if ever so slightly. These systems are not subject to the fatigue, combat stress, and other factors that occasionally cloud human judgment. And if responsibly developed and properly constrained, they could ensure that missions are executed strictly according to the rules of engagement and the commander’s intent. A world with autonomous weapons could be one where the principles of international humanitarian law (IHL) are not only respected but also strengthened.

The key to avoiding the catastrophes predicted in the letter is restricting what such a weapon can and can’t do. It might, for example, be allowed to operate only for a limited time or in a limited geographic area — perhaps underwater or in other areas in which civilians are not present. This would, in turn, increase a commander’s control over the weapon and strengthen accountability for the system’s use – a key concern among advocates of a ban on autonomous weapons. These machines could also be designed to target only military hardware, thereby strengthening adherence to the IHL principles of proportionality and distinction and further reducing civilian casualties.

These positive outcomes are possible only if the international community offers careful stewardship. First and most importantly, states will need to agree upon a definition of “autonomous weapons.” At the recent UN meeting on Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems, governments and non-governmental organizations expressed widely divergent, and frequently incompatible, notions of autonomy and autonomous weapons. 

Some argued that existing systems qualify as autonomous, while others, such as the United Kingdom, argued that they “do not and may never” exist. Clarifying the definition will be critical to advancing the dialogue and to establishing responsible design requirements and operating parameters.

Second, governments must ensure that meaningful human control exists over their autonomous weapons. As Michael Horowitz and Paul Scharre have written in their primer on the subject, this should include standards that help operators make deliberate, legal, and moral decisions about the use of force.

Third, governments should implement strict testing and evaluation standards to ensure that any weapon that can autonomously pick a target or begin an engagement performs as intended, and that procedures for its use are clear to operators. In order to ensure that such systems continue to operate in accordance with their design features, governments should agree to periodic testing in realistic operating environments.

Finally, it will be essential for governments to further explore the ways in which accountability for the use of autonomous weapons can be established and enforced. While such an undertaking will be undoubtedly challenging, it will be critical in ensuring that the use of these systems adheres to IHL and reducing potential risks. 

Despite the somewhat breathless tone of the letter, its signatories draw attention to an important technological development that the international community would do well to address in a measured and calm way. Autonomous weapons will never remove the human dimension of warfare, but if we are careful, they just might thin the fog.

DefenseOne

 

 

« In The War of 2050, The Robots Call The Shots
UK MPs are No longer Exempt from Surveillance »

Infosecurity Europe
CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Practice Labs

Practice Labs

Practice Labs is an IT competency hub, where live-lab environments give access to real equipment for hands-on practice of essential cybersecurity skills.

BackupVault

BackupVault

BackupVault is a leading provider of automatic cloud backup and critical data protection against ransomware, insider attacks and hackers for businesses and organisations worldwide.

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO is the market leader in HPE Non-Stop Security, Risk Management and Compliance.

Resecurity

Resecurity

Resecurity is a cybersecurity company that delivers a unified platform for endpoint protection, risk management, and cyber threat intelligence.

Directory of Cyber Security Suppliers

Directory of Cyber Security Suppliers

Our Supplier Directory lists 7,000+ specialist cyber security service providers in 128 countries worldwide. IS YOUR ORGANISATION LISTED?

Clearpath Solutions Group

Clearpath Solutions Group

Clearpath Solutions Group expertise covers virtualization and data storage technologies, networking, security and cloud computing.

StratoKey

StratoKey

StratoKey is an intelligent Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) that secures your cloud and SaaS applications against data breaches, so you can do secure and compliant business in the cloud.

BlueID

BlueID

BlueID is an IDaaS technology product which enables your objects to securely connect and interact with your users’ smart phones and smart watches.

Authentic8

Authentic8

Authentic8 transforms how organizations secure and control the use of the web with Silo, its patented cloud browser.

Blue Ridge Networks

Blue Ridge Networks

Blue Ridge offers a suite of solutions that enable secure remote access to the enterprise network with protection and control of endpoints.

National Cyber Summit (NCS)

National Cyber Summit (NCS)

The National Cyber Summit is the preeminent event for cyber training, education and workforce development aimed at protecting our nation's infrastructure from the ever-evolving cyber threat.

Cyber Security Raad (CSR) - Netherlands

Cyber Security Raad (CSR) - Netherlands

The Cyber Security Council (CSR) is a national, independent advisory body of the Dutch government undertaking efforts at strategic level to bolster cyber security in the Netherlands.

SkillCube

SkillCube

SkillCube is one of the pioneers in India focusing on Cyber Security Skill Development Solutions.

Osirium

Osirium

The Osirium PxM Privileged Access Management platform addresses both security and compliance requirements by defining who gets access to what and when.

WebSec

WebSec

WebSec is a cybersecurity firm based in Amsterdam (NL) and Wyoming (US), specializing in offensive security services including penetration testing, red teaming, and tailored security assessments.

AdaCore

AdaCore

AdaCore is focused on helping developers build safe, secure and reliable software.

Fortified Health Security

Fortified Health Security

Fortified’s team of cybersecurity specialists is dedicated to helping healthcare providers, payers and business associates protect their patient data across the Fortified Healthcare Ecosystem.

Private Client Cyber Security (PCCS)

Private Client Cyber Security (PCCS)

PCCS provides enterprise-grade cybersecurity consulting and services to professional practices, executives, athletes, and high net worth families.

Synergy Quantum

Synergy Quantum

Synergy Quantum has pioneered a proprietary suite of military-grade, quantum-secure communication technologies.

CQR

CQR

CQR are at the forefront of innovative cyber solutions, dedicated to securing and fortifying Operational technology (OT) infrastructure.

AVIANET

AVIANET

AVIANET's goal is to empower enterprises and corporations worldwide and manage their digital transformation journey with confidence.