Deterrence & Cyber Attacks On The US Electoral System

 

The sanctions and expulsions announced recently against Russia raise important questions about how the United States can effectively deter cyberattacks of this kind in the future, and how effective the measures announced will likely be in doing so.

 

Deterring future cyber-meddling in US elections will require convincing adversaries, Russia and others, that any future such meddling will either be:

A. Ineffective and/or

B. Too costly to be worthwhile.

There are at least two ways to make such operations ineffective:

  • First, the United States could seek to dampen or counter the influence on the actual electoral debate, for example, by swiftly exposing them, a resilience strategy akin to what was sometimes called passive defense during the Cold War.​
  • Second, the United States could seek simply to make such operations impossible by developing highly effective cyber-network defenses, a strategy akin to what was sometimes called active defense.

To make it clear that cyber operations against future elections will be costly, the United States must also demonstrate both a capability and a will to strike back in the future, in other words to punish those states and actors that might contemplate using their cyber capabilities in this way.

Demonstrating a capability to punish is relatively easy, indeed almost unnecessary. The United States has a broad arsenal of military, diplomatic, financial and other means at its disposal to inflict costs on any country that might seek to use cyber tools to interfere in its elections.

Demonstrating the will to do so is much, much more difficult. It requires making clear that the United States judges the stakes at hand to be so important that it would be willing to make use a broad range of tools from its arsenal, even if the costs of doing so were high, to punish future leaders who conducted cyberattacks against US elections.

Given these requirements, how much will the US response help deter future attacks?

On the helpful side, the measures should help make future enemy cyber operations easier to detect and thus riskier and more likely to fail. The Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigations will now make certain information about Russian cyber capabilities available to the private sector. How much of an effect this will have, however, remains to be seen.

Also on the helpful side, the expulsions and the sanctions impose some cost on the perpetrators while also demonstrating some will on the part of the United States to make some sacrifices because expulsions may eventually be met with reprisals in kind from Moscow, not-with-standing President Vladimir Putin's announcement that he won't retaliate in kind to the expulsions.

Yet whether accepting this cost is enough to impress the Kremlin and deter future action is debatable.

If it truly wishes to deter future action, the United States may thus move toward a stronger declaratory posture by going further in emphasising (publicly and privately to the Kremlin) the very high importance of the integrity of the US democratic process in the future.

The recent White House statement refers to international law and harm to US interests, but it might have stated more forcefully that attacks on the US democratic process are utterly unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

Criticisms of the response on the basis that it does not use existing cyber tools to retaliate are misplaced.

First of all, the US response leaves that possibility open by stating that “we will continue to take a variety of actions at a time and place of our choosing, some of which will not be publicised.” So the United States might still exercise the cyber options it has.

There is no reason to assume that a cyber response is necessarily the best deterrent against cyber-attacks.

If it doesn't, however, that's not necessarily a mistake. There is no reason to assume that a cyber response is necessarily the best deterrent against cyber-attacks. Meanwhile, using existing military cyber tools would have been escalatory while removing options that the United States would better reserve for wartime. Some cyber weapons, once used, can't be used again.

A US cyber operation that exposed corruption within the regime now or later might have some deterrent effect. However, exposing corruption would be mostly cost-free for the United States, so it doesn't underscore US will or stake. It's also difficult to repeat.

A better option would perhaps be to demonstrate a capability to expose corruption, perhaps by exposing the tip of the iceberg, while leaving much of the capability in reserve, to keep the proverbial powder dry so that it can deter future attacks.

A single response does not need to constitute a complete cyber deterrence posture and the measures announced recently should not be judged as such. Effective deterrence in the cyber domain can only emerge out of a consistent set of actions, policies, and declarations over time.

Looking ahead, however, the United States will need to emphasize consistently the importance of the integrity of the electoral process. The time may soon come when the United States needs to demonstrate its willingness to sacrifice to protect it.

Rand:    

Electoral Influence: 40yrs Of Kremlin Interference:       German Spy Chief Fears Russian Interference In 2017 Elections:

 

« Uber Wants Self-Flying Vertical Takeoff Cars
How To Automate Cyber Defense »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Syxsense

Syxsense

Syxsense brings together endpoint management and security for greater efficiency and collaboration between IT management and security teams.

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO is the market leader in HPE Non-Stop Security, Risk Management and Compliance.

BackupVault

BackupVault

BackupVault is a leading provider of automatic cloud backup and critical data protection against ransomware, insider attacks and hackers for businesses and organisations worldwide.

IT Governance

IT Governance

IT Governance is a leading global provider of information security solutions. Download our free guide and find out how ISO 27001 can help protect your organisation's information.

Resecurity, Inc.

Resecurity, Inc.

Resecurity is a cybersecurity company that delivers a unified platform for endpoint protection, risk management, and cyber threat intelligence.

Oxygen Forensics

Oxygen Forensics

Oxygen Forensics offer the most advanced forensic data examination tools for mobile devices and cloud services.

Encode

Encode

Encode delivers a cutting edge Security Analytics & Response Orchestration platform and best of breed Cyber Security Operations and Services.

National Centre of Incident Readiness & Strategy for Cybersecurity (NISC) - Japan

National Centre of Incident Readiness & Strategy for Cybersecurity (NISC) - Japan

NISC was established as a secretariat of the Cybersecurity Strategy Headquarters in collaboration with the public and private sectors to create a "free, fair and secure cyberspace" in Japan.

JLT Specialty

JLT Specialty

JLT Specialty is a leading specialist insurance broker. Services offered include Cyber Risks insurance.

VisionWare

VisionWare

VisionWare provide consulting services and solutions in areas covering both physical and digital security.

SISSDEN

SISSDEN

SISSDEN will improve cybersecurity through the development of increased awareness and the effective sharing of actionable threat information.

EY Advisory

EY Advisory

EY is a multinational professional services firm headquartered in the UK. EY Advisory service areas include Cybersecurity.

Independent Security Evaluators (ISE)

Independent Security Evaluators (ISE)

ISE is an independent security consulting firm headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland dedicated to securing high value assets for global enterprises and performing groundbreaking security research.

Stage2Data

Stage2Data

Stage2Data is one of Canada’s most trusted cloud solution providers offering hosted Backup and Disaster Recovery Services.

Munich Re

Munich Re

Munich Re is a leading global provider of reinsurance, primary insurance and insurance-related risk solutions including Cyber.

New Net Technologies (NNT)

New Net Technologies (NNT)

NNT SecureOps provides ultimate protection against all forms of cyberattack and data breaches by automating the essential security controls.

Xscale Accelerator

Xscale Accelerator

Xscale's vision is to create world-class startups out of India by transforming sales and providing access to global markets.

Beyon Cyber

Beyon Cyber

Beyon Cyber offer a complete portfolio of advanced solutions & services for cyber security in Bahrain.

Transatlantic Cyber Security Business Network

Transatlantic Cyber Security Business Network

The Transatlantic Cyber Security Business Network is a coalition of UK and US cyber security companies which facilitates collaboration to help address critical cyber security challenges.

Darknone Global

Darknone Global

Darknone is a consortium of elite hackers and security leaders united by an unbridled passion for augmenting the security of the digital realm.

IDCARE

IDCARE

IDCARE is Australia and New Zealand’s national identity & cyber support service. Our service is the only one of its type in the world.