Deterrence & Cyber Attacks On The US Electoral System

 

The sanctions and expulsions announced recently against Russia raise important questions about how the United States can effectively deter cyberattacks of this kind in the future, and how effective the measures announced will likely be in doing so.

 

Deterring future cyber-meddling in US elections will require convincing adversaries, Russia and others, that any future such meddling will either be:

A. Ineffective and/or

B. Too costly to be worthwhile.

There are at least two ways to make such operations ineffective:

  • First, the United States could seek to dampen or counter the influence on the actual electoral debate, for example, by swiftly exposing them, a resilience strategy akin to what was sometimes called passive defense during the Cold War.​
  • Second, the United States could seek simply to make such operations impossible by developing highly effective cyber-network defenses, a strategy akin to what was sometimes called active defense.

To make it clear that cyber operations against future elections will be costly, the United States must also demonstrate both a capability and a will to strike back in the future, in other words to punish those states and actors that might contemplate using their cyber capabilities in this way.

Demonstrating a capability to punish is relatively easy, indeed almost unnecessary. The United States has a broad arsenal of military, diplomatic, financial and other means at its disposal to inflict costs on any country that might seek to use cyber tools to interfere in its elections.

Demonstrating the will to do so is much, much more difficult. It requires making clear that the United States judges the stakes at hand to be so important that it would be willing to make use a broad range of tools from its arsenal, even if the costs of doing so were high, to punish future leaders who conducted cyberattacks against US elections.

Given these requirements, how much will the US response help deter future attacks?

On the helpful side, the measures should help make future enemy cyber operations easier to detect and thus riskier and more likely to fail. The Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigations will now make certain information about Russian cyber capabilities available to the private sector. How much of an effect this will have, however, remains to be seen.

Also on the helpful side, the expulsions and the sanctions impose some cost on the perpetrators while also demonstrating some will on the part of the United States to make some sacrifices because expulsions may eventually be met with reprisals in kind from Moscow, not-with-standing President Vladimir Putin's announcement that he won't retaliate in kind to the expulsions.

Yet whether accepting this cost is enough to impress the Kremlin and deter future action is debatable.

If it truly wishes to deter future action, the United States may thus move toward a stronger declaratory posture by going further in emphasising (publicly and privately to the Kremlin) the very high importance of the integrity of the US democratic process in the future.

The recent White House statement refers to international law and harm to US interests, but it might have stated more forcefully that attacks on the US democratic process are utterly unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

Criticisms of the response on the basis that it does not use existing cyber tools to retaliate are misplaced.

First of all, the US response leaves that possibility open by stating that “we will continue to take a variety of actions at a time and place of our choosing, some of which will not be publicised.” So the United States might still exercise the cyber options it has.

There is no reason to assume that a cyber response is necessarily the best deterrent against cyber-attacks.

If it doesn't, however, that's not necessarily a mistake. There is no reason to assume that a cyber response is necessarily the best deterrent against cyber-attacks. Meanwhile, using existing military cyber tools would have been escalatory while removing options that the United States would better reserve for wartime. Some cyber weapons, once used, can't be used again.

A US cyber operation that exposed corruption within the regime now or later might have some deterrent effect. However, exposing corruption would be mostly cost-free for the United States, so it doesn't underscore US will or stake. It's also difficult to repeat.

A better option would perhaps be to demonstrate a capability to expose corruption, perhaps by exposing the tip of the iceberg, while leaving much of the capability in reserve, to keep the proverbial powder dry so that it can deter future attacks.

A single response does not need to constitute a complete cyber deterrence posture and the measures announced recently should not be judged as such. Effective deterrence in the cyber domain can only emerge out of a consistent set of actions, policies, and declarations over time.

Looking ahead, however, the United States will need to emphasize consistently the importance of the integrity of the electoral process. The time may soon come when the United States needs to demonstrate its willingness to sacrifice to protect it.

Rand:    

Electoral Influence: 40yrs Of Kremlin Interference:       German Spy Chief Fears Russian Interference In 2017 Elections:

 

« Uber Wants Self-Flying Vertical Takeoff Cars
How To Automate Cyber Defense »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Perimeter 81 / How to Select the Right ZTNA Solution

Perimeter 81 / How to Select the Right ZTNA Solution

Gartner insights into How to Select the Right ZTNA offering. Download this FREE report for a limited time only.

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO is the market leader in HPE Non-Stop Security, Risk Management and Compliance.

IT Governance

IT Governance

IT Governance is a leading global provider of information security solutions. Download our free guide and find out how ISO 27001 can help protect your organisation's information.

Clayden Law

Clayden Law

Clayden Law advise global businesses that buy and sell technology products and services. We are experts in information technology, data privacy and cybersecurity law.

BackupVault

BackupVault

BackupVault is a leading provider of automatic cloud backup and critical data protection against ransomware, insider attacks and hackers for businesses and organisations worldwide.

Contrast Security

Contrast Security

Contrast Security is the leader in modernized application security, embedding code analysis and attack prevention directly into software.

Cristie Data

Cristie Data

Cristie have been a trusted, innovative and leading edge data storage, backup and virtualisation solutions provider across all sectors of industry for over 40 years.

Cloudbric

Cloudbric

Cloudbric is a cloud-based web security service, offering award-winning WAF, DDoS protection, and SSL, all in a full-service package.

AGAT Software

AGAT Software

AGAT Software is an innovative security provider specializing in external access authentication and data protection solutions.

CalCom

CalCom

CalCom Hardening Solution (CHS) for Microsoft OMS is a security baseline-hardening solution designed to address the needs of IT operations and security teams.

Cyberbit

Cyberbit

Cyberbit empowers cybersecurity teams to be fully prepared with a product portfolio ready to detect and respond effectively across both IT and OT networks.

Rewertz

Rewertz

Rewterz is a cyber security company based out of Dubai, serving customers in UAE, Oman, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan.

CSIRT Italia

CSIRT Italia

CSIRT Italia is the national Computer Security Incident Response Team for Italy.

Cyber Covered

Cyber Covered

Cyber Covered provide complete website & data cover with market leading cyber insurance and powerful compliance software in one affordable package.

Cynexlink

Cynexlink

Cynexlink offers Managed IT Services with Security, Network, Storage & Cloud solutions for all size of business.

Get Indemnity

Get Indemnity

Get Indemnity are specialist insurance brokers with experience working on a wide range of innovative business insurance products that combine risk management, indemnity and incident response services.

SearchInform

SearchInform

SearchInform is a leading risk management product developer, protecting business and government institutions against data theft, harmful human behavior, compliance breaches and incomplete audit.

Samurai Digital Consulting

Samurai Digital Consulting

Samurai Digital Security are a cyber and Information security services provider, specialising in penetration testing, incident response, user awareness and information governance solutions.

Fenix24

Fenix24

Fenix24 is an industry leader in the incident-response space. We ensure the fastest response, leading to the full restoration of critical infrastructure, data, and systems.

Unciphered

Unciphered

Unciphered was created as the first company providing services for opening locked hardware cryptocurrency wallets.

Nightwing

Nightwing

Nightwing is the intelligence services company that continually redefines the edge of the possible to keep advancing our national security interests.