Cyber Warfare Takes A New Turn

The recent ransomware events have created headaches and headlines, but also masked a greater cyber-issue: chaos and disruption on the Internet as the new normal. Earlier this week, in fact, the Alliance for Securing Democracy, a new effort headed by former US national security officials, formed as a separate, nongovernmental program to investigate Russian cyber-meddling.

Previous cyber-incidents focused on information acquisition, network infiltration or precision strikes to sabotage the opposition. What are we seeing now are disruptive cyber-actions, with the apparent goals of signaling capability, disrupting normal systems and demonstrating the instability of Western democratic models.

Ransom is not the issue

A number of analysts described the Petya/NotPetya incident of June and the WannaCry event in May as ransom attacks, aimed at gaining as much bitcoin as possible. But our analysis of cyber-coercion highlights how ransomware events such as the Petya are often strategically motivated and less about gaining funds than they are about sending a signal. The primary goal instead appears to be limited destruction through malware wiping systems.

These events can be classified as cyber-disruptions: the use of malware and website defacements between rivals as a form of coercive bargaining. Rival states use cyber-operations to signal one another. Cyber-operations are a 21st-century form of political warfare.

North Korea and Russia are the likely originators of these attacks. What’s the motivation, beyond simply the chaos factor? For Russia, the Petya attack could be a means of encouraging the perception of Ukraine as a failed state, a view that aligns with Russian interests.

Cyber-operations amplify larger psychological warfare efforts. North Korea’s goal, most likely, could be to cause general chaos in Western systems, as a means of signaling strength, and its capacity to escalate in any future crisis.

This is a new era of cyber-conflict

This wave of cyber-disruptions highlights an evolving strategic logic. Competitive interactions in the digital domain evolved from an early period of cyber-probing and testing (1980-2001) to a more stable recent period of cyber-restraint (2001-2016). With Russia’s brazen attempts to undermine American electoral infrastructure and amplify conspiratorial themes through US media outlets, we entered a new era.

The strategic logic of cyber has now shifted from restraint to one of disruption and constant harassment designed to signal capability and the threat of escalation. Russian hackers targeted US institutions, most likely hoping to gain leverage before entering complex negotiations around sanctions, Ukraine and Syria.

While we have yet to witness the extremes of cyberwar, the more subtle danger since 2016 is the way states like Russia and North Korea use cyber-strategies as a form of political warfare. These attacks create chaos, which challenges the prevailing international order and major institutions, from commerce to hospitals to elections, that represent the foundations of Western societies.

Why cyber-warfare works

States have learned that cyber-operations offer a 21st-century vehicle to conduct old-fashioned covert action and psychological warfare without significant fear of rebuke. Russian cyber-meddling over the past two years went largely unpunished in public. Instead, the United States relied on covert coercion to prevent escalation.

Cyber-strategies have now become indirect forms of coercion designed to weaken adversary resolve and create uncertainty, as well as undermine alliances or create political wedges. A growing number of states are using cyber-intrusions to wage psychological warfare and leak information with propaganda value.

In addition to propaganda, states use cyber-operations to influence elections and conduct disruption operations. Russian interference in the elections of Western states has become so common it is now expected. But instead of just disrupting elections, Russia now seems to be leveraging cyberespionage and propaganda to generate larger crises.

Rival states are using cyberspace to wage political warfare campaigns. Here are recent examples:

1) A new group called Global Leaks, an offshoot of the Russian military-attributed group DC Leaks, released the emails of the United Arab Emirates ambassador to the United States in June, causing tensions among Persian Gulf allies by suggesting an alignment between UAE and Israel.

2) In May, Vietnam covertly released transcripts of Donald Trump’s discussions with Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte to disrupt the relationship. Closer ties among China, the Philippines and the United States are problematic for other members of the Association of Southeast Asian Countries hoping to operate by consensus and ward off encroachments by China. Cyber-operations thus became a useful tool to disrupt that developing relationship.

3) In the Middle East, cyber-operations undermine alliances and isolate actors. In June, a Russian hack on Qatar’s state news agency and fake information incorrectly attributing positive statements about Hamas and Iran to the Emir of Qatar may have provoked the first online international crisis. The moves re-sparked a long-standing dispute in the Middle East.

The embargo and ejection of Qatar from the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) demonstrates how cyber-operations can have heavy diplomatic ramifications. Russia manipulated the entire Gulf region to turn its back on Qatar by planting stories to be picked up by Saudi news agencies. This led to a cascading diplomatic crisis. Saudi Arabia severed relations with Qatar. Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan and the UAE quickly followed suit.

All of these examples suggest a different character of cyber-conflict, and any new efforts to monitor and curtail these efforts will face no shortage of challenges. To date, cyber-exchanges operated largely under relatively stable international norms, as suggested by Joseph Nye. Yes, China stole intellectual property and rivals probed each other’s networks, but these events didn’t create dangerous crises or seek to undermine faith in Western institutions.

Russia now appears to be using Ukraine as more than a testing ground for cyberwar, it is demonstrating its ability to disrupt faith in public institutions. While the resulting crises after a cyber-event risk inadvertent escalation, the real danger is the erosion of cyber norms. With each new cyber-disruption, the shock decreases, and we grow to expect disorder.

The resulting uncertainty and chaos undermines our trust in the open Internet architecture and risks upsetting stability inherent in cyber-exchanges to date.

Ein News

You Might Also Read: 

Cyberwar: A New Front For US Military:

NATO Could Go To War In Response To A Cyber Attack:

 

« The Impact Of AI On Employment Demands New Thinking
Dark Web Marketplaces Shut Down »

Infosecurity Europe
CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

North Infosec Testing (North IT)

North Infosec Testing (North IT)

North IT (North Infosec Testing) are an award-winning provider of web, software, and application penetration testing.

Authentic8

Authentic8

Authentic8 transforms how organizations secure and control the use of the web with Silo, its patented cloud browser.

LockLizard

LockLizard

Locklizard provides PDF DRM software that protects PDF documents from unauthorized access and misuse. Share and sell documents securely - prevent document leakage, sharing and piracy.

DigitalStakeout

DigitalStakeout

DigitalStakeout enables cyber security professionals to reduce cyber risk to their organization with proactive security solutions, providing immediate improvement in security posture and ROI.

Clayden Law

Clayden Law

Clayden Law advise global businesses that buy and sell technology products and services. We are experts in information technology, data privacy and cybersecurity law.

CyberSource

CyberSource

CyberSource provides online payment and fraud management services for medium and large-sized merchants.

Aqua Security Software

Aqua Security Software

Aqua Security helps enterprises secure their cloud native applications from development to production, whether they run using containers, serverless, or virtual machines.

National Digital Exploitation Centre (NDEC) - United Kingdom

National Digital Exploitation Centre (NDEC) - United Kingdom

NDEC is a project to create a centre of cyber and digital development and education for the UK. It will offer training in digital practices, cyber security and research.

Digi International

Digi International

Digi is a leading global provider of mission-critical and business-critical machine-to-machine (M2M) and Internet of Things (IoT) connectivity products and services.

Kiuwan

Kiuwan

Kiuwan provide software security solutions with SAST and SCA source-code analysis that fit into your DevOps process.

OmniCyber Security

OmniCyber Security

Omni is a cyber security firm specialising in Penetration Testing, Managed Security and Compliance.

Xopero Software

Xopero Software

Xopero Software develops a comprehensive range of professional tools for protecting and restoring critical business data.

The ATOM Group

The ATOM Group

ATOM builds and secures technology for regulated industries. We design and build for a future we can all trust.

DoQubiz Technology

DoQubiz Technology

DoQubiz is using the idea of security through obscurity to develop their proprietary Fractal Security Engine that implements a highly resilient data protection protocol.

Quantum eMotion (QeM)

Quantum eMotion (QeM)

Quantum eMotion is a Montreal-based advanced developer leading the way towards a new generation of quantum-safe encryption for the quantum computing age.

Anjuna Security

Anjuna Security

Software from Anjuna Security effortlessly enables enterprises to safely run even their most sensitive workloads in the public cloud.

Bastion Networks

Bastion Networks

Bastion are a security-focussed managed solution provider and consultancy. We work with advanced cyber security vendors to produce managed security solutions to protect from online threats.

Ingenics Digital

Ingenics Digital

Ingenics Digital is a recognized initiator and leading service provider in the areas of software development and embedded systems.

Astreya

Astreya

Astreya is the leading IT solutions provider for some of the world's most recognizable and innovative organizations.

Driven Technologies

Driven Technologies

Driven is a cloud native service provider transforming the way companies leverage technology to improve business by securing, modernizing, and connecting applications, users, and data.

Tuskira

Tuskira

Tuskira is a Preemptive Cyber Defense & Response Platform powered by Agentic AI, designed to go beyond traditional vulnerability management.