Cyber Warfare Takes A New Turn

The recent ransomware events have created headaches and headlines, but also masked a greater cyber-issue: chaos and disruption on the Internet as the new normal. Earlier this week, in fact, the Alliance for Securing Democracy, a new effort headed by former US national security officials, formed as a separate, nongovernmental program to investigate Russian cyber-meddling.

Previous cyber-incidents focused on information acquisition, network infiltration or precision strikes to sabotage the opposition. What are we seeing now are disruptive cyber-actions, with the apparent goals of signaling capability, disrupting normal systems and demonstrating the instability of Western democratic models.

Ransom is not the issue

A number of analysts described the Petya/NotPetya incident of June and the WannaCry event in May as ransom attacks, aimed at gaining as much bitcoin as possible. But our analysis of cyber-coercion highlights how ransomware events such as the Petya are often strategically motivated and less about gaining funds than they are about sending a signal. The primary goal instead appears to be limited destruction through malware wiping systems.

These events can be classified as cyber-disruptions: the use of malware and website defacements between rivals as a form of coercive bargaining. Rival states use cyber-operations to signal one another. Cyber-operations are a 21st-century form of political warfare.

North Korea and Russia are the likely originators of these attacks. What’s the motivation, beyond simply the chaos factor? For Russia, the Petya attack could be a means of encouraging the perception of Ukraine as a failed state, a view that aligns with Russian interests.

Cyber-operations amplify larger psychological warfare efforts. North Korea’s goal, most likely, could be to cause general chaos in Western systems, as a means of signaling strength, and its capacity to escalate in any future crisis.

This is a new era of cyber-conflict

This wave of cyber-disruptions highlights an evolving strategic logic. Competitive interactions in the digital domain evolved from an early period of cyber-probing and testing (1980-2001) to a more stable recent period of cyber-restraint (2001-2016). With Russia’s brazen attempts to undermine American electoral infrastructure and amplify conspiratorial themes through US media outlets, we entered a new era.

The strategic logic of cyber has now shifted from restraint to one of disruption and constant harassment designed to signal capability and the threat of escalation. Russian hackers targeted US institutions, most likely hoping to gain leverage before entering complex negotiations around sanctions, Ukraine and Syria.

While we have yet to witness the extremes of cyberwar, the more subtle danger since 2016 is the way states like Russia and North Korea use cyber-strategies as a form of political warfare. These attacks create chaos, which challenges the prevailing international order and major institutions, from commerce to hospitals to elections, that represent the foundations of Western societies.

Why cyber-warfare works

States have learned that cyber-operations offer a 21st-century vehicle to conduct old-fashioned covert action and psychological warfare without significant fear of rebuke. Russian cyber-meddling over the past two years went largely unpunished in public. Instead, the United States relied on covert coercion to prevent escalation.

Cyber-strategies have now become indirect forms of coercion designed to weaken adversary resolve and create uncertainty, as well as undermine alliances or create political wedges. A growing number of states are using cyber-intrusions to wage psychological warfare and leak information with propaganda value.

In addition to propaganda, states use cyber-operations to influence elections and conduct disruption operations. Russian interference in the elections of Western states has become so common it is now expected. But instead of just disrupting elections, Russia now seems to be leveraging cyberespionage and propaganda to generate larger crises.

Rival states are using cyberspace to wage political warfare campaigns. Here are recent examples:

1) A new group called Global Leaks, an offshoot of the Russian military-attributed group DC Leaks, released the emails of the United Arab Emirates ambassador to the United States in June, causing tensions among Persian Gulf allies by suggesting an alignment between UAE and Israel.

2) In May, Vietnam covertly released transcripts of Donald Trump’s discussions with Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte to disrupt the relationship. Closer ties among China, the Philippines and the United States are problematic for other members of the Association of Southeast Asian Countries hoping to operate by consensus and ward off encroachments by China. Cyber-operations thus became a useful tool to disrupt that developing relationship.

3) In the Middle East, cyber-operations undermine alliances and isolate actors. In June, a Russian hack on Qatar’s state news agency and fake information incorrectly attributing positive statements about Hamas and Iran to the Emir of Qatar may have provoked the first online international crisis. The moves re-sparked a long-standing dispute in the Middle East.

The embargo and ejection of Qatar from the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) demonstrates how cyber-operations can have heavy diplomatic ramifications. Russia manipulated the entire Gulf region to turn its back on Qatar by planting stories to be picked up by Saudi news agencies. This led to a cascading diplomatic crisis. Saudi Arabia severed relations with Qatar. Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan and the UAE quickly followed suit.

All of these examples suggest a different character of cyber-conflict, and any new efforts to monitor and curtail these efforts will face no shortage of challenges. To date, cyber-exchanges operated largely under relatively stable international norms, as suggested by Joseph Nye. Yes, China stole intellectual property and rivals probed each other’s networks, but these events didn’t create dangerous crises or seek to undermine faith in Western institutions.

Russia now appears to be using Ukraine as more than a testing ground for cyberwar, it is demonstrating its ability to disrupt faith in public institutions. While the resulting crises after a cyber-event risk inadvertent escalation, the real danger is the erosion of cyber norms. With each new cyber-disruption, the shock decreases, and we grow to expect disorder.

The resulting uncertainty and chaos undermines our trust in the open Internet architecture and risks upsetting stability inherent in cyber-exchanges to date.

Ein News

You Might Also Read: 

Cyberwar: A New Front For US Military:

NATO Could Go To War In Response To A Cyber Attack:

 

« The Impact Of AI On Employment Demands New Thinking
Dark Web Marketplaces Shut Down »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Resecurity, Inc.

Resecurity, Inc.

Resecurity is a cybersecurity company that delivers a unified platform for endpoint protection, risk management, and cyber threat intelligence.

CSI Consulting Services

CSI Consulting Services

Get Advice From The Experts: * Training * Penetration Testing * Data Governance * GDPR Compliance. Connecting you to the best in the business.

NordLayer

NordLayer

NordLayer is an adaptive network access security solution for modern businesses — from the world’s most trusted cybersecurity brand, Nord Security. 

Syxsense

Syxsense

Syxsense brings together endpoint management and security for greater efficiency and collaboration between IT management and security teams.

DigitalStakeout

DigitalStakeout

DigitalStakeout enables cyber security professionals to reduce cyber risk to their organization with proactive security solutions, providing immediate improvement in security posture and ROI.

Reed Smith LLP

Reed Smith LLP

Reed Smith LLP is an international law firm with offices in the USA, Europe, Middle East and Asia. Practice areas include Information Technology, Privacy & Data Security.

SureCloud

SureCloud

SureCloud is a Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) and Cybersecurity Solutions provider.

Konfidas

Konfidas

Konfidas provide high-level cybersecurity consulting and professional tailored solutions to meet specific cybersecurity operational needs.

International School of IT Security (ISITS)

International School of IT Security (ISITS)

The International School of IT Security (ISITS) is a leading provider of professional training in the field of IT Security.

Cysec - TU Darmstadt

Cysec - TU Darmstadt

CYSEC is the Cybersecurity faculty of the Technical University of Darmstadt and performs internationally renowned research in numerous areas of cybersecurity.

Japan Information Security Audit Association (JASA)

Japan Information Security Audit Association (JASA)

JASA is non-profit association active in developing and managing the quality of Information Security Auditing and Auditors in Japan.

Dragos

Dragos

Dragos has built the first industrial cybersecurity ecosystem, the ultimate security defense.

DirectDefense

DirectDefense

DirectDefense is an information security services and managed services provider.

Xperien

Xperien

Xperien is a leading South African Information Technology Asset Disposition (ITAD) company.

Envelop Risk

Envelop Risk

Envelop Risk is a global specialty cyber insurance firm, combining decades of insurance industry expertise with sophisticated cyber and artificial intelligence-based analytics.

ForAllSecure

ForAllSecure

ForAllSecure’s mission is to make the world’s software safe by pioneering autonomous cybersecurity tools that automatically find and fix vulnerabilities in run-time executable software.

Drata

Drata

Drata is a security and compliance automation platform that continuously monitors and collects evidence of a company's security controls, while streamlining workflows to ensure audit-readiness.

Matrium Technologies

Matrium Technologies

Matrium Technologies has been a leading provider of technology solutions since 1991, with a strong industry background in Network Testing, Network Visibility and Security.

CypherEye

CypherEye

CypherEye is a next generation trust platform that advances the current state of Multi-factor Authentication (MFA) to enable highly secure, private and auditable cyber-transactions.

ASMGi

ASMGi

ASMGi is a managed services, security and GRC solutions, and software development provider.

Invisily

Invisily

Invisily makes enterprise and cloud computing resources invisible to attackers with zero trust solutions, making them visible only when needed to only those who need them.