Claims That Google's Search Algorithm Spread False Information

Google’s search algorithm appears to be systematically promoting information that is either false or slanted with an extreme rightwing bias on subjects as varied as climate change and homosexuality.

Following a recent investigation by the UK=Published  Observer newspaper, which found that Google’s search engine prominently suggests neo-Nazi websites and anti-Semitic writing, the Guardian has uncovered a dozen additional examples of biased search results.

Google’s search algorithm and its autocomplete function prioritize websites that, for example, declare that climate change is a hoax, being gay is a sin, and the Sandy Hook mass shooting never happened.

The increased scrutiny on the algorithms of Google, which removed anti-Semitic and sexist autocomplete phrases after the recent Observer investigation, comes at a time of tense debate surrounding the role of fake news in building support for conservative political leaders, particularly US president-elect Donald Trump.

Facebook has faced significant backlash for its role in enabling widespread dissemination of misinformation, and data scientists and communication experts have argued that rightwing groups have found creative ways to manipulate social media trends and search algorithms.

The Guardian’s latest findings further suggest that Google’s searches are contributing to the problem.

In the past, when a journalist or academic exposes one of these algorithmic hiccups, humans at Google quietly make manual adjustments in a process that’s neither transparent nor accountable.

At the same time, politically motivated third parties including the “alt-right”, a far-right movement in the US, use a variety of techniques to trick the algorithm and push propaganda and misinformation higher up Google’s search rankings.

These insidious manipulations, both by Google and by third parties trying to game the system, impact how users of the search engine perceive the world, even influencing the way they vote. This has led some researchers to study Google’s role in the presidential election in the same way that they have scrutinized Facebook.

Robert Epstein from the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology has spent four years trying to reverse engineer Google’s search algorithms. He believes, based on systematic research, that Google has the power to rig elections through something he calls the search engine manipulation effect (SEME).

Epstein conducted five experiments in two countries to find that biased rankings in search results can shift the opinions of undecided voters. If Google tweaks its algorithm to show more positive search results for a candidate, the searcher may form a more positive opinion of that candidate.

In September 2016, Epstein released findings, published through Russian news agency Sputnik News, that indicated Google had suppressed negative autocomplete search results relating to Hillary Clinton.

Even changing the order in which certain search terms appear in the autocompleted list can make a huge impact, with the first result drawing the most clicks, he said.

At the time, Google said the autocomplete algorithm was designed to omit disparaging or offensive terms associated with individuals’ names but that it wasn’t an “exact science”.

Then there’s the secret recipe of factors that feed into the algorithm Google uses to determine a web page’s importance, embedded with the biases of the humans who programmed it. These factors include how many and which other websites link to a page, how much traffic it receives, and how often a page is updated. People who are very active politically are typically the most partisan, which means that extremist views peddled actively on blogs and fringe media sites get elevated in the search ranking.

“These platforms are structured in such a way that they are allowing and enabling, consciously or unconsciously, more extreme views to dominate,” said Martin Moore from Kings College London’s Centre for the Study of Media, Communication and Power.

Epstein wants Google to be more transparent about how and when it manually manipulates the algorithm.

“They are constantly making these adjustments. It’s absurd for them to say everything is automated,” he said. Manual removals from autocomplete include “are jews evil” and “are women evil”. Google has also altered its results so when someone searches for ways to kill themselves they are shown a suicide helpline.

Shortly after Epstein released his research indicating the suppression of negative autocomplete search results relating to Clinton, which he credits to close ties between the Clinton campaign and Google, the search engine appeared to pull back from such censorship, he said. This, he argued, allowed for a flood of pro-Trump, anti-Clinton content (including fake news), some of which was created in retaliation to bubble to the top.

“If I had to do it over again I would not have released those data. There is some indication that they had an impact that was detrimental to Hillary Clinton, which was never my intention.”

The problem has become particularly challenging for Google in a post-truth era, where white supremacist websites may have the same indicator of “trustworthiness” in the eyes of Google as other websites high in the page rank.

“What does Google do when the lies aren’t the outliers any-more?” Heller said. “Previously there was the assumption that everything on the internet had a glimmer of truth about it. With the phenomenon of fake news and media hacking, that may be changing.”

A Google spokeswoman said in a statement: “We’ve received a lot of questions about autocomplete, and we want to help people understand how it works: Autocomplete predictions are algorithmically generated based on users’ search activity and interests. Users search for such a wide range of material on the web, 15% of searches we see every day are new.

Because of this, terms that appear in Autocomplete may be unexpected or unpleasant. We do our best to prevent offensive terms, like porn and hate speech, from appearing, but we don’t always get it right. Autocomplete isn’t an exact science and we’re always working to improve our algorithms.”

Guardian:          On Facebook, Fake US Election News Was More Popular Than Real News:

 

« Cyber Deterrence: How To Curb Cyber Attacks
Smartwatch Technology For Police Forces »

Infosecurity Europe
CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Infosecurity Europe, 3-5 June 2025, ExCel London

Infosecurity Europe, 3-5 June 2025, ExCel London

This year, Infosecurity Europe marks 30 years of bringing the global cybersecurity community together to further our joint mission of Building a Safer Cyber World.

ManageEngine

ManageEngine

As the IT management division of Zoho Corporation, ManageEngine prioritizes flexible solutions that work for all businesses, regardless of size or budget.

North Infosec Testing (North IT)

North Infosec Testing (North IT)

North IT (North Infosec Testing) are an award-winning provider of web, software, and application penetration testing.

Authentic8

Authentic8

Authentic8 transforms how organizations secure and control the use of the web with Silo, its patented cloud browser.

CYRIN

CYRIN

CYRIN® Cyber Range. Real Tools, Real Attacks, Real Scenarios. See why leading educational institutions and companies in the U.S. have begun to adopt the CYRIN® system.

Exodus Intelligence

Exodus Intelligence

Exodus Intelligence are an industry leading provider of exclusive zero-day vulnerability intelligence, exploits, defensive guidance, and vulnerability research trends.

Karamba Security

Karamba Security

Karamba provide an IoT Security solution for ECUs in automobiles which ensures that all cars are protected (not just autonomous cars).

Secure Source

Secure Source

Secure Source specialise in search and recruitment for Cyber Security and Security Cleared markets.

Array Networks

Array Networks

Array Networks, the network functions platform company, develops purpose-built systems for hosting virtual networking and security functions with guaranteed performance.

Ogasec

Ogasec

Ogasec is a cybersecurity company formed by the merger between Aker and N-Stalker in 2017. Solutions include Security & Connectivity Networking, Application Security, and Managed Security Services.

Cervello

Cervello

Cervello is a leading provider of comprehensive and proven solutions to protect railways against cyber attacks.

First Point Group (FPG)

First Point Group (FPG)

First Point Group provide a global technological recruitment service worldwide. Within that we have a specialist team of Cyber Security recruiters.

FireCompass

FireCompass

FireCompass SAAS platform helps CISOs & Security Teams in continuous risk assessment by mapping your attack surface and knowing the “unknown unknowns”.

Parameter Security

Parameter Security

Parameter Security is a provider of ethical hacking and information security services.

Russell Reynolds Associates

Russell Reynolds Associates

Russell Reynolds Associates is a global leadership advisory and search firm with functional expertise in Digital Leadership, Data & Analytics, and Compliance.

SpecterOps

SpecterOps

SpecterOps has unique insight into the cyber adversary mindset and brings the highest caliber, most experienced resources to assess your organizations defenses.

Clear Skye

Clear Skye

Clear Skye, an Identity Access and Management (IAM) software company, reimagines enterprise identity access and risk management software to make a complicated problem easier to manage.

Albania Lab

Albania Lab

Albania Lab is a consulting company focused on the development and delivery of digital solutions and IT services including cybersecurity.

RiskSmart

RiskSmart

RiskSmart empower risk, compliance, and legal teams with a tech-led and data-driven platform designed to save time, reduce costs and add real value to businesses.

LastPass

LastPass

LastPass provides award-winning password and identity management solutions that are convenient, effortless, and easy to manage.

Kali Linux

Kali Linux

Kali Linux is an open-source, Debian-based Linux distribution geared towards various information security tasks, such as Penetration Testing.