Bashing Facebook Is Not The Answer To Curbing Russian Influence Operations

Scapegoating Facebook is an easy way to explain the relative success of Russia's influence operations during the U.S. election in 2016. However it distracts from more fundamental questions on how election meddling should be confronted.

By Jamie Collier & Monica Kaminska

With Facebook revealing the true extent of Russia’s information operations during the U.S. election on their platform, journalists have not held back in casting social media firms as the pantomime villain in recent election interference sagas. At the core of recent criticism is the assertion that social media firms are now serious political influencers, and crucially ones that are incapable of self-policing themselves with further regulation necessary.

Although social media platforms could always improve at preventing foreign governments from interfering in elections, the recent furor distracts from more fundamental questions on how election meddling should be confronted. Crucially, further clamping down on Facebook and Twitter is not the elixir to recent election interferences that many hope for.

The role of social media in influencing elections should not be discounted. As these platforms become increasingly prevalent, their influence on our thought processes and emotions will only increase. Yet, multiple factors affect elections, ranging from the state of the economy to healthcare provision. This makes it difficult to assess the true political impact of social media strategies and their influence on voting behavior. A number of actors compete for voters’ attention including official campaigns, political action committees, the tabloid press and far-leaning ideological websites. Russian activity therefore operates in a highly congested space, and its impact is likely to get crowded out by more influential groups. For example, tabloids  possess a significant following of news-hungry potential voters, already sympathetic to a particular political stance. Likewise, official candidate campaigns have access to detailed data on prospective voters and millions of dollars to spend on digital advertising. The Trump campaign reportedly spent $90 million on Facebook, making Russia’s $100,000 ad buy look like pocket change.

Russia may be able to promote causes that coincide with Russian interests. Yet influencing those who are not already on board is increasingly difficult online given the echo chambers that exist on social media. Facebook users interact predominantly with like-minded friends, they subscribe to news outlets that coincide with their own worldview. This means there is a limited pool of swing voters that could be converted to the extremes to suit Russian interests.

Many have made the case that Russia’s real aim is not to convince others, but to exploit existing divisions within societies. Even then, it remains unclear whether social media campaigns are really that effective. Passive forms of online participation often fail to materialize into more active forms of political mobilization. Only four protesters turned up to an anti-refugee rally in Idaho organized by a Russian-backed Facebook group despite significantly higher numbers saying they were ‘interested’ online. Previous research also suggests that content on social networks is most influential when shared among close friends—strong ties trump obscure foreign-government backed campaigns.

Placing Russian-backed political social media advertising on a pedestal implies that Moscow’s approach is somehow novel. It is not. Russia, much like the United States, has used political propaganda for decades. One of the Soviet Union’s most famous campaigns was “active measures” launched during the Cold War against the election of Ronald Reagan. More recently, Russia has had a hand in political subversion in Ukraine, the Baltic States and Georgia. But while political Facebook ads might be a case of old wine in new bottles, Russian actors have been engaging in a wide range of other cyber intrusions, and it is these that merit more public attention.

If tech companies and policymakers want to address Russian election meddling, they should see Russian cyber operations as a spectrum of activity, from the relatively soft forms of interference conducted via social media, through to hacking, and even the compromise of election infrastructure (a particular concern for states that allow online voting). Instead of narrowly focusing on social media manipulation, they should focus on Russian efforts to dox and launder internal campaign emails through sites like Wikileaks. The operation against the Democratic National Committee was remarkably disruptive and effective, and similar events occurred in 2015 at the German Bundestag and Emmanuel Macron’s campaign in France earlier this year. It is these operations that have the greatest potential to directly influence an election result and damage confidence in democratic institutions, while simultaneously providing material for future influence efforts.

Bashing Facebook and Twitter do nothing to nullify the plausible deniability of election interference that Russia and influence peddlers thrive on. It is up to political campaigns, not social media platforms, to develop effective public relations strategies to counter the effects of doxing through WikiLeaks and improve their woeful cybersecurity. Likewise, governments and the media need to candidly talk about the way in which news outlets report on foreign government-backed leaks, a hugely contentious issue. Clamping down on social media firms represents an easy fix by comparison—one that does not require substantial change or compromise from within governments and political parties.

While Silicon Valley will play its part in preventing future political interference, the real change must take place in Washington DC.

About The Authors: 

Jamie Collier is a cybersecurity DPhil candidate and a research affiliate with the Cyber Studies Programme at the University of Oxford. Monica Kaminska is a DPhil candidate and previously worked on the Computational Propaganda Project at the Oxford Internet Institute.

 

 

« Wikileaks Release Details Of Mass Surveillance In Russia
N.Korea's Cyber Threats To S.Korea »

Infosecurity Europe
CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

ZenGRC

ZenGRC

ZenGRC (formerly Reciprocity) is a leader in the GRC SaaS landscape, offering robust and intuitive products designed to make compliance straightforward and efficient.

MIRACL

MIRACL

MIRACL provides the world’s only single step Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) which can replace passwords on 100% of mobiles, desktops or even Smart TVs.

LockLizard

LockLizard

Locklizard provides PDF DRM software that protects PDF documents from unauthorized access and misuse. Share and sell documents securely - prevent document leakage, sharing and piracy.

TÜV SÜD Academy UK

TÜV SÜD Academy UK

TÜV SÜD offers expert-led cybersecurity training to help organisations safeguard their operations and data.

Infosecurity Europe, 3-5 June 2025, ExCel London

Infosecurity Europe, 3-5 June 2025, ExCel London

This year, Infosecurity Europe marks 30 years of bringing the global cybersecurity community together to further our joint mission of Building a Safer Cyber World.

Foundation for Strategic Research (FRS)

Foundation for Strategic Research (FRS)

The Foundation for Strategic Research is France's main independent think tank on strategic, defense and security issues. Cyber security is covered as part of the study areas.

SonicWall

SonicWall

SonicWall provide products for network security, access security, email security & encryption.

Gemserv

Gemserv

Gemserv is a specialist market design, governance and assurance services consultancy.

African Cyber Security

African Cyber Security

African Cyber Security and it's partners, have the expertise and skills to provide holistic solutions for companies, institutions and government.

Drootoo

Drootoo

Drootoo is transforming businesses and making them high performing entities with its unified cloud platform.

ToucanX

ToucanX

ToucanX has eliminated remote attack vectors without sacrificing productivity. We’ve brought embedded near real time virtualization to the enterprise endpoint.

Telefonica Global Solutions (TGS)

Telefonica Global Solutions (TGS)

Telefonica Global Solutions is the technological partner of wholesalers and enterprises, helping them to achieve the digitalization they need.

Deeper Network

Deeper Network

Deeper Network represents the world's first decentralized blockchain network for building a truly private, secure and fair Internet.

Terra Quantum

Terra Quantum

Terra Quantum is a deep tech pioneer, developing revolutionary quantum applications to shape the technology of the future.

Protexxa

Protexxa

Protexxa is a B2B SaaS cybersecurity platform that leverages Artificial Intelligence to rapidly identify, evaluate, predict, and resolve cyber issues for employees.

Beyon Cyber

Beyon Cyber

Beyon Cyber offer a complete portfolio of advanced solutions & services for cyber security in Bahrain.

Getvisibility

Getvisibility

Getvisibility enables customers to detect, classify and protect sensitive information increasing data security, governance, compliance and lowering the risk of losing valuable data.

Bitdefender Voyager Ventures (BVV)

Bitdefender Voyager Ventures (BVV)

Bitdefender Voyager Ventures is an early-stage investment vehicle focused on cybersecurity, data analytics and automation startups.

SOCRadar

SOCRadar

SOCRadar is an Extended Threat Intelligence (XTI) SaaS platform that combines External Attack Surface Management (EASM), Digital Risk Protection Services (DRPS), and Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI).

Liverton Security

Liverton Security

Liverton Security is a New Zealand-owned cyber security provider offering consultancy and security-related products to government and commercial customers throughout New Zealand.

Palindrome Technologies

Palindrome Technologies

Palindrome Technologies help clients defend against cyberattacks across all attack surfaces, including hardware, software, network-to-cloud, people, and emerging technologies.