Audit Finds Cyber Vulnerabilities In US Missile Defense System

The Army, Navy and Missile Defense Agency are failing to take basic cybersecurity steps to ensure that information on America’s ballistic missile defense system won’t fall into nefarious hands, according to a Defense Department Inspector General audit released in December.

Investigators visited five sites that manage ballistic missile defense elements and technical information, but the names of the commands were redacted in the publicly released report.

“The Army, Navy and MDA did not protect networks and systems that process, store, and transmit (missile defense) technical information from unauthorized access and use,” the declassified report states.

Such inadequacies “may allow US adversaries to circumvent (missile defense) capabilities, leaving the United States vulnerable to missile attacks,” the report states.

They found officials failed to employ safeguards familiar to most people online in 2018, the latest development to raise questions about the U.S. military’s cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

Among the shortcomings: Administrators for classified networks had no intrusion detection and prevention systems in place to watch for cyberattacks, much less stop them, according to the report.

At one site, officials said they had requested to purchase those cyber safeguards in December 2017 but nine months later it still hadn’t been approved.

“Without intrusion detection and prevention capabilities, (the site) cannot detect malicious attempts to access its networks and prevent cyberattacks designed to obtain unauthorised access and exfiltrate sensitive (missile defense) technical information,” the report states.

Officials also failed to patch system flaws after receiving vulnerability alerts, one of which had first been identified in 1990 and had still not been fixed by April.

Another vulnerability that could be exploited by an attacker was first identified in 2013 but also was never patched, according to the report.

“Countless cyber incident reports show that the overwhelming majority of incidents are preventable by implementing basic cyber hygiene and data safeguards, which include regularly patching known vulnerabilities,” the IG report states. “(Missile defense) technical information that is critical to national security could be compromised through cyberattacks that are designed to exploit these weaknesses.”

Some facilities failed to force employees to use common access cards, or CAC, when accessing the classified system, a basic cybersecurity practice known as multi-factor identification.

Instead, officials were able to access the sensitive information using just a username and password, the report states.

Hackers use phishing and other tactics to exploit passwords and gain access to such systems.

New hires are supposed to be allowed network access without a card for only their first two weeks on the job. But IG investigators found users on the systems without CAC cards for up to seven years.

At one site, a domain administrator never configured the network to allow only CAC holder access.

“Allowing users to access networks using single factor authentication increases the potential that cyber attackers could exploit passwords and gain access to sensitive (missile defense) technical information,” the report states.

Investigators also found unlocked server racks at some locations, another key vulnerability to insider snoopers.

“The insider threat risk necessitates that organisations implement controls…to reduce the risk of malicious personnel manipulating a server’s ability to function as intended and compromising sensitive and classified data,” the report states.

External storage devices held unencrypted data and some sites failed to track who was accessing data, and why. Other administrators told investigators that they lacked the ability to record or monitor data downloaded from the network onto these devices.

Unless these officials enforce the encryption of such removed data and monitor its downloading and transferring, “they will be at increased risk of not protecting sensitive and classified (missile defense) technical information from malicious users,” the report states.

Investigators also found that some supposedly secure sites were failing to even lock their doors. One location had a security door that hadn’t worked for years.

“Although security officials were aware of the problem, they did not take appropriate actions to prevent unauthorised personnel from gaining unauthorized access to the facility,” the report states.

Other sites featured no security cameras to monitor personnel movement and security officers failed to conduct badge checks.

While the report makes recommendations to fix the documented problems, officials for the inspected agencies offered no comments on the non-classified draft report of the audit.

Friday’s scathing IG audit marked the latest in a string of reports detailing shoddy cybersecurity throughout the armed forces and defense contractors.

During the same week, the Wall St. Journal reported that Chinese hackers are targeting military systems and those of defense contractors working on Navy projects.

Beijing-linked cyber raids have attempted to steal everything from missile plans to ship-maintenance data in a series of hacks over the past 18 months, the Journal reports.

As a result, Navy Secretary Richard Spencer has ordered a “comprehensive cybersecurity review” to assess if the Navy’s cyber efforts “are optimally focused, organised, and resourced to prevent serious breaches,” spokesman Capt. Greg Hicks said.

The review will also look at authorities, accountability and if the efforts reflect and incorporate government and industry best practices, he said.

“Secretary Spencer’s decision to direct a review reflects the serious to which the DoN prioritises cybersecurity in this era of renewed great power competition,” Hicks said.

Navy Times:

You Might Also Read:

Chinese Hackers Steal Naval Warfare Secrets

 

« Women In Cyber Take The Spotlight
The US Is Buying Phone Hacking Tools For Ghana’s Police »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Syxsense

Syxsense

Syxsense brings together endpoint management and security for greater efficiency and collaboration between IT management and security teams.

Directory of Cyber Security Suppliers

Directory of Cyber Security Suppliers

Our Supplier Directory lists 7,000+ specialist cyber security service providers in 128 countries worldwide. IS YOUR ORGANISATION LISTED?

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO Technology

XYPRO is the market leader in HPE Non-Stop Security, Risk Management and Compliance.

IT Governance

IT Governance

IT Governance is a leading global provider of information security solutions. Download our free guide and find out how ISO 27001 can help protect your organisation's information.

North Infosec Testing (North IT)

North Infosec Testing (North IT)

North IT (North Infosec Testing) are an award-winning provider of web, software, and application penetration testing.

Steptoe & Johnson

Steptoe & Johnson

Steptoe is an international law firm with offices in the USA, Europe and China. Practice areas include Cybersecurity, Privacy & National Security.

Claroty

Claroty

Claroty was conceived to secure and optimize OT networks that run the world’s most critical infrastructures.

Software Factory

Software Factory

Software Factory develops custom-built high-performance software solutions and products for applications including industrial cyber security.

RedSeal

RedSeal

RedSeal’s network modeling and risk scoring platform is the foundation for enabling enterprise networks to be resilient to cyber events.

Information System Authority (RIA) - Estonia

Information System Authority (RIA) - Estonia

RIA ensures the interoperability of the state’s information system, organises activities related to information security, and handles security incidents in Estonian computer networks.

Centre for Multidisciplinary Research, Innovation & Collaboration (C-MRiC)

Centre for Multidisciplinary Research, Innovation & Collaboration (C-MRiC)

C-MRiC collaborates on initiatives, ranging from national cyber security, enterprise security, information assurance, protection strategy, climate control to health and life sciences.

Adlumin

Adlumin

Adlumin Inc. provides the enterprise-grade security operations platform and managed detection and response services that keep mid-market organizations secure.

Cybriant

Cybriant

Cybriant Strategic Security Services provide a framework for architecting, constructing, and maintaining a secure business with policy and performance alignment.

Dhound

Dhound

Dhound is a cybersecurity company providing web application penetration testing.

SecureTech360

SecureTech360

SecureTech360 is a cybersecurity and IT consulting firm whose principals have extensive experience in Cybersecurity and Information Technology.

nsKnox

nsKnox

nsKnox is a fintech-security company, enabling corporations and banks to prevent fraud and ensure compliance in B2B Payments.

KSOC Labs

KSOC Labs

KSOC is an event-driven SaaS platform built to automatically remediate Kubernetes security risks.

CodeLock

CodeLock

Codelock is a patent-pending solution that continuously provides software security at the code level, while providing advanced management insights with performance metrics and data analytics.

Whitaker Brothers

Whitaker Brothers

Whitaker Brothers data destruction equipment can be found in 115 countries and every single continent in the world, from major military organizations to small offices.

DNS Research Federation (DNSRF)

DNS Research Federation (DNSRF)

DNSRF's mission is to advance the understanding of the Domain Name System's impact on cybersecurity, policy and technical standards.

Merlin Ventures

Merlin Ventures

Merlin Ventures is a strategic investor focused on driving growth and value for cybersecurity software companies with market-leading potential.