AI Is Replacing Human Made Decisions In The US Military

A new survey of existing weapons systems  finds that AI is increasingly used to replace humans, not just helping them.

The Pentagon’s oft-repeated line on artificial intelligence is this: we need much more of it, and quickly, in order to help humans and machines work better alongside one another. But a survey of existing weapons finds that the US military more commonly uses AI not to help but to replace human operators, and, increasingly, human decision making.

The report from the Elon Musk-funded Future of Life Institute does not forecast Terminators capable of high-level reasoning. At their smartest, our most advanced artificially intelligent weapons are still operating at the level of insects … armed with very real and dangerous stingers.

So where does AI exist most commonly on military weapons? The study, which looked at weapons in military arsenals around the world, found 284 current systems that include some degree of it, primarily standoff weapons that can find their own way to a target from miles away. Another example would be Aegis warships that can automatically fire defensive missiles at incoming threats.

“This matches the overall theme, autonomy is currently not being developed to fight alongside humans on the battlefield, but to displace them. This trend, especially for UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles], gets stronger when examining the weapons in development. Thus despite calls for ‘centaur warfighting,’ or human-machine teaming, by the US Defense Department, what we see in weapons systems is that if the capability is present, the system is fielded in the stay [meaning instead of] of humans rather than with them,” notes Heather M. Roff, the author of the Report.

Roff found that the most common AI feature on a weapon was homing: “the capability of a weapons system to direct itself to follow an identified target, whether indicated by an outside agent or by the weapons system itself.” It’s been around for decades; many more recent AI capabilities spring from it.

On the the other end of the technology spectrum is certain drones’ ability to loiter over an area, compare objects on the ground against a database of images, and mark a target when a match comes up, all without human guidance.

Roff writes that these capabilities, which she calls autonomous loitering and target image and signal discrimination, represent “a new frontier of autonomy, where the weapon does not have a specific target but a set of potential targets in an image library or target library (for certain signatures like radar), and it waits in the engagement zone until an appropriate target is detected. This technology is on a low number of deployed systems, but is a heavy component of systems in development.”

For an indication of where AI on drones is headed look to cutting-edge experimental machines like Dassault’s nEUROn, BAE’s Taranis, and Northrop Grumman’s  X-47B. Unlike General Atomics’ Predator and Reaper drones, which the military armed to take out terrorist targets in places like Afghanistan, these more advanced drones are designed for war with countries that can actually shoot back. The so-called anti-access/area denial challenge, or A2AD, requires aircraft that use stealth to slip in under enemy radar and then operate on their own over enemy territory. It’s the key thing pushing autonomy in weapons to the next level.

“This is primarily due to the type of task the stealth combat UAV is designed to achieve: defeating integrated enemy air defense systems. In those scenarios, a UAV will likely be without communications and in a contested and denied environment. The system will need to be able to communications share with other deployed systems in the area opportunistically, as well as engage and re-plan when necessary,” Roff writes.

At the recent Air Force Association conference outside Washington, DC, Deputy Defense Secretary Bob Work called greater autonomy essential to US military technological dominance. Citing a report from the Defense Science Board, he said, “There is one thing that will improve the performance of the battle network more than any other. And you must win the competition because you are in it whether you like it or not. And that is exploiting advances in artificial intelligence and autonomy. That will allow the joint force to assemble and operate human machine battle networks of even greater power.”

But even if the US military “wins the competition” by producing the best autonomic systems, other nations may yet put AI to unexpected and even destabilizing effect. “It should be noted that the technological incorporation of autonomy will not necessarily come only from the world’s strongest powers, and the balancing effect that may have will not likely be stabilizing. Regional powers with greater abilities in autonomous weapons development, such as Israel, may destabilize a region through their use or through their export to other nations,” says Roff.

That’s not the only reason more smarts on more weapons could be destabilizing.  Machines make decisions faster than humans. On the battlefield of the future, the fastest machines, those that make the best decisions with the least amount of human input, offer the largest advantage.

Today, the United States continues to affirm that it isn’t interested in removing the human decision-maker from “the loop” in offensive operations like drone strikes (at least not completely). That moral stand might begin to look like a strategic disadvantage against an adversary that can fire much faster, conduct more operations, hit more targets in a smaller amount of time by removing the human from loop.

The observe, orient, decide, and act cycle, sometimes called the OODA loop, is today in the hands of humanity when it comes to warfare. But in other areas of human activity, like high-frequency trading, it’s moved to the machines. William Roper, the head of the Pentagon’s Strategic Capabilities Office, discussed his concerns about that acceleration at the recent Defense One Technology Summit.

“When you think about the day-trading world of stock markets, where it’s really machines that are doing it, what happens when that goes to warfare?” Roper asked. “It’s a whole level of conflict that hasn’t existed. It’s one that’s scary to think about what other countries might do that don’t have the same level of scruples as the US.”

It’s also scary to think about what the United States might do if its leaders woke up in a war where they were losing to those countries.

DefenseOne:     Lethal Autonomous Weapons & The Future of War
 

 

« UK Cyber Highway Will Improve Security
Cyber Attacks Do More Damage Than Physical Attacks »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

Perimeter 81 / How to Select the Right ZTNA Solution

Perimeter 81 / How to Select the Right ZTNA Solution

Gartner insights into How to Select the Right ZTNA offering. Download this FREE report for a limited time only.

ManageEngine

ManageEngine

As the IT management division of Zoho Corporation, ManageEngine prioritizes flexible solutions that work for all businesses, regardless of size or budget.

CYRIN

CYRIN

CYRIN® Cyber Range. Real Tools, Real Attacks, Real Scenarios. See why leading educational institutions and companies in the U.S. have begun to adopt the CYRIN® system.

Jooble

Jooble

Jooble is a job search aggregator operating in 71 countries worldwide. We simplify the job search process by displaying active job ads from major job boards and career sites across the internet.

Resecurity, Inc.

Resecurity, Inc.

Resecurity is a cybersecurity company that delivers a unified platform for endpoint protection, risk management, and cyber threat intelligence.

Trusted Computing Group

Trusted Computing Group

TCG was formed to develop, define and promote open, vendor-neutral, global industry standards, supportive of a hardware-based root of trust, for interoperable trusted computing platforms.

Lookout

Lookout

Lookout is the data-centric cloud security company that uses a defense-in-depth strategy to address the different stages of a modern cybersecurity attack.

Digital Infrastructure Association (DINL)

Digital Infrastructure Association (DINL)

DINL is the leading representative for companies and organisations which are active within the Dutch digital infrastructure sector.

AllClear ID

AllClear ID

AllClear ID provides products and services that help protect people and their personal information from threats related to identity theft.

SIGA

SIGA

SIGA provides cyber security solutions for Industrial Control Systems SCADA systems used in critical infrastructures and industrial processes.

XignSYS

XignSYS

XignSys develops innovative password-free and user-friendly Authentication solutions and electronic signature systems for B2B and B2C applications.

AnubisNetworks

AnubisNetworks

AnubisNetworks is one of Europe’s leading threat intelligence and email security suppliers.

Communications Authority of Kenya

Communications Authority of Kenya

The Authority is responsible for facilitating the development of the information and communications sectors including; broadcasting, telecommunications, electronic commerce and cybersecurity.

IoT Security Institute (IoTSI)

IoT Security Institute (IoTSI)

IoT Security Institute is an academic and industry body dedicated to providing frameworks and supporting educational services to assist in managing security within an Internet of Things eco-system.

C5 Capital

C5 Capital

C5 Capital is a specialist investment firm that exclusively invests in the secure data ecosystem including cybersecurity, cloud infrastructure, data analytics and space.

NetApp Excellerator

NetApp Excellerator

NetApp Excellerator is NetApp’s global start-up program that aims to fuel innovation by partnering with deep-tech start-ups.

Spamhaus

Spamhaus

Spamhaus is the world leader in supplying realtime highly accurate threat intelligence to the Internet's major networks.

Centre for Cyber Security Research and Innovation (CSRI) - Deakin University

Centre for Cyber Security Research and Innovation (CSRI) - Deakin University

CSRI solves the cyber security threats of tomorrow, today. We work with industry and government leaders on innovative research that has real-world impact.

1898 & Co

1898 & Co

Keep your critical assets secure with a comprehensive portfolio of services from high-level assessments to fully managed security services designed for operational technology applications.

KSOC Labs

KSOC Labs

KSOC is an event-driven SaaS platform built to automatically remediate Kubernetes security risks.

Versent

Versent

Versent is an Australian-born technology company, focused on architecting, building & operating cloud native applications, data streams, platforms, and services.