A Predictive Tool For Armed Police

Police operations will be able to use behavioral data and get warning signs that a police officer may be breaking the force’s rules and is about to shoot an unarmed civilian.

To build the algorithms that may one day be able to create a sort of “risk score” for police, researchers are using familiar tools: data from police body cameras and squad cars, and the internal reports usually kept locked in police departments away from researchers, including information on officer suspensions and civilian complaints.

Of all this information, body cameras, which were purpose-built to create an objective and unaltered record of an officer’s every move on the job, may be the most valuable. At least in theory: Since the Justice Department began offering $ millions in grants for body cameras in 2015 and advocates began clamoring for the technology, police have claimed their cameras have fallen off and become unplugged or blew-up and the footage deleted.

But the push to use body cameras on police now has a surprising source: the camera industry itself. Late April, Axon, the No. 1 manufacturer of body cameras in the United States, announced its Performance tool, which is seemingly targeted at the long line of high-profile body-camera failures.

The tool, a paid upgrade for current customers, is a dashboard that quantifies how often officers turn their cameras on during calls and whether they categorise videos correctly.

Axon’s announcement came just after a jury convicted the Minneapolis police officer Mohamed Noor of shooting and killing an unarmed civilian, the Australian-born yoga instructor Justine Damond. The case is among the most high-profile incidents of police violence that involved body-camera failure.

While both Noor and his partner wore body cameras the night Damond was shot, neither was turned on to record the shooting. Shannon Barnette, the sergeant on duty and Noor’s supervisor, was the first to arrive on the scene after Damond’s death. Footage from her body camera is split into three parts.

In the first, she drives to the scene. In the second, she approaches another officer; says “I’m on,” presumably referring to her body camera; and then turns the camera off. The footage resumes two minutes later. Prosecutors asked Barnette why her camera was turned off, then on. “No idea,” Barnette responded. He testified that the department’s policy on when the cameras are supposed to be on was “not clear” at the time. Since the shooting, the Minneapolis Police Department has revised its policy: The cameras stay on.

Lauren Haynes, the former associate director of the Center for Data Science and Public Policy at the University of Chicago, helped design a statistical model to predict when officers may become involved in an “adverse event,” anything from a routine complaint up to an officer-involved shooting. The project didn’t use the kind of body-camera data that Axon’s new tool works with, but she says they’re “absolutely something that could be put into the model.”

The team found that a number of stressors were related to those adverse events, including whether officers worked a second job, whether they took too many sick days, and whether they’d recently responded to a domestic-violence incident or a suicide. Place matters, too: Officers were more likely to be involved in an adverse event if they were sent into neighborhoods far from their usual beat.

Haynes thinks it’s possible that officers won’t be completely opposed to the idea of risk scoring. “If it comes off as a punitive thing, people are going to be against it,” she says. On the other hand, if the scores are presented as a tool to keep departments from pushing officers too hard, the plan might gain some support.

“You want to put people in the right interventions for them,” Haynes says. “There are all kinds of different solutions depending on what the specific risk is.”

Predictive tools have an inherent risk. They offer only the probability of any event happening. They could be wrong or even dangerous, creating feedback loops that penalize officers who seek counseling, for example. Cameras and algorithms offer potential tools for police accountability, but don’t ensure it.

DefenseOne:

You Might Also Read:

Smartphones Are Working For Dutch Police:

 

 

« US Army Identifies How To Improve Cybersecurity
Digital Advertising Is A $Billion Ripoff »

CyberSecurity Jobsite
Perimeter 81

Directory of Suppliers

ZenGRC

ZenGRC

ZenGRC - the first, easy-to-use, enterprise-grade information security solution for compliance and risk management - offers businesses efficient control tracking, testing, and enforcement.

ManageEngine

ManageEngine

As the IT management division of Zoho Corporation, ManageEngine prioritizes flexible solutions that work for all businesses, regardless of size or budget.

BackupVault

BackupVault

BackupVault is a leading provider of automatic cloud backup and critical data protection against ransomware, insider attacks and hackers for businesses and organisations worldwide.

Syxsense

Syxsense

Syxsense brings together endpoint management and security for greater efficiency and collaboration between IT management and security teams.

Authentic8

Authentic8

Authentic8 transforms how organizations secure and control the use of the web with Silo, its patented cloud browser.

CORDIS

CORDIS

CORDIS is the European Commission's primary public repository and portal to disseminate information on all EU-funded research projects and their results.

Spirion

Spirion

Spirion offers data discovery, classification, and protection tools for your business's privacy, security, and compliance program to avoid gaps and risks.

Forter

Forter

Forter provides new generation fraud prevention to meet the challenges faced by modern enterprise e-commerce.

CybeReady

CybeReady

CybeReady’s Autonomous Platform offers continuous adaptive training to all employees and guarantees significant reduction in organizational risk of phishing attacks.

CyberProof

CyberProof

CyberProof aims to give clarity and confidence to businesses worldwide using a new risk-based approach to cyber security services.

Webtotem

Webtotem

Webtotem's mission is to prevent the global epidemic of website infection and provide every website owner with basic security rights.

GlobalPass

GlobalPass

Covering 200+ countries with 78 000 databases, GlobalPass provides sophisticated facial biometrics verification and deep screening, delivering peace of mind to every client.

Casque SNR

Casque SNR

CASQUE SNR is the next generation of Identity Assurance that has potential to supersede existing solutions. It provides Identity Assurance for both people and things.

Query.ai

Query.ai

At Query.AI, we are committed to helping companies unlock the power of their security data, so they are empowered to meet security investigation and response goals while simultaneously reducing costs.

NARIS

NARIS

NARIS is the leading provider of an integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance platform called NARIS GRC.

MoogleLabs

MoogleLabs

MoogleLabs leverage AI/ML, Blockchain, DevOps, and Data Science to come up with the best solutions for diverse businesses.

Halogen Group

Halogen Group

Halogen Group is the leading Security Solutions Provider in West Africa. Services encompass Physical Security, Electronic Security, Virtual & Cyber Security, Risk Assessments and Training.

Recast Software

Recast Software

Recast Software exists to simplify the work of IT teams and enable them to create highly secure and compliant environments.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform, delivered as a single application, fundamentally changing the way Development, Security, and Ops teams collaborate and build software.

LMNTRIX

LMNTRIX

LMNTRIX eliminates the complexity and burden of cyber security for organizations struggling to prepare for, prevent and respond to cyberattacks.

Xantaro

Xantaro

Xantaro specializes in technologies, software and services for Carriers, ISPs, Hosting and Cloud Providers as well as for Operators of Data Centres and Campus Networks.